Re: [lp-wan] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Wed, 26 February 2020 10:32 UTC
Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EF03A128F for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdDkEDvwtS5H for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7773E3A1294 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id w69so1932555ilk.6 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:32:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PNK8x1rm4H1S5lk/0jUWCxUI80JD6ofFSYy9Us/3eU4=; b=r/tJJNYa+Gtt+yh3KckZt4NOzv3ZRSJ7D2TXvxtmSHPqun0pEmIJYXRpEk/4epgg8j 5/3D7QFQkvAOljyAg+/0fnxQLix7KhWOCYHL2o2rIK3nTobrPatAimFwmwt5L02PTcCu zG2IgpwcHVWBv2+Xw6zYdFMStZ7KVVQGwPzQO0IeRH5++jbfdPyTc9eh39/QjmXJipn8 amrhUDVEvo1u4gL2Twg+G/Uei9HtlfjSIzFQbo0a65olfRZpjVyCsucEyfawHmHwgJbP hT/uQ4yQ3bAaqB7DNbD4faG0Q1JtKM7eDr6bgcNw7c0jZ9wlUfO3xrnaaEALagSuJQHL aAoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PNK8x1rm4H1S5lk/0jUWCxUI80JD6ofFSYy9Us/3eU4=; b=s00vNcGseCRy4rRMq9XDA5vLP63haebtly0iqsqzJrmFKnk3UGCNmJql3zAXgC1VkW oHIrqUrUFOOK6hcE+StY2eF4x0zd/pmANP0Mn2WstYB1RbdLHJ0hZnARsRnqWSgetgR/ LrnBc/YWMHtGOsvQDEzi9EPuB7qc4GuJ7es42/qRyfnmfXJzMjgEJ5ku9m58cJu7t8N4 gxhO2iYdTfh7yCfah6pFHDclQvPajcslKdJx86tPuJxJyUIMJoQPG3Ta/mSrMUOSwROP ByE1RfzERqtnR1N51TOiQBebUbw2E6ynX/Ui3onmleJrB1ivWUfvj3p4alG5oruhffNy n3cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4TYqQAvQG2lwZ5Y6wp4puaNPkZSuchSQzSOTSkssJp2b+j9iz dZhx9WURJIP3iwwb1FrX+Llh2I/EiSYaKsBkb7WrRg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzTDvASXWXYerIuIWR/yuCyRCUQpkjlcQCh/DYkUxt9xv6UdqCQmEDB9+MeZbDHGeCBvNC3MDlxTtkE355rtP4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:4a08:: with SMTP id m8mr2845562ilf.41.1582713169551; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:32:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158206251932.14014.17306768810197219116@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158206251932.14014.17306768810197219116@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:32:23 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nSdUnOCr8VXHhuHYbAruh+07DjCZp0_aoUUJp5WP51yiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc.all@ietf.org, Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040c8f0059f782041"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/uRV_nvFbDNDK__FTM7R7Q3keZNA>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:32:52 -0000
Dear Linda, Thank you for your review, we have developed all the acronyms and briefly explains the SCHC compression in the introduction. We plan to publish a new version soon, including your review. Ana On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:48 PM Linda Dunbar via Datatracker < noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors. > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any > other > last call comments. The document describes using SCHC Header compression > mechanism to compress CoAP headers. The mechanism is clear. Some Nits: - > using many acronyms without explaining them, such as MSB, TV used in > several > places. It would be nicer to expand the acronyms when first use them. - > Page 4: > "... a request may contain an Accept option and the response a Content > option". > Should you add a "... the response contain a Content option"? > > Linda Dunbar > > >
- [lp-wan] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lp… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [lp-wan] Opsdir last call review of draft-iet… Ana Minaburo