[Lsr] "Restart Signaling for IS-IS" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF86128B14 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:19:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCmuQo8aUVlQ for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6511277C8 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:19:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9164; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1542136784; x=1543346384; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=gS7LRxBJX2NU95bXxFL/k034ntgjgBIPs24AoskpZQk=; b=JlfEOXLPF0fdylHKn9afhFM0nCw4WWxhjPr/apYUkevmz4IySks5bD07 bCF3/zKJJj+1ivIPWdbtNUHymZ5U74xgaRPj75HK13jo/XFv4lCypdch3 VvPfkzoofWqtBn5r2xudAbIlMSVSPpHb3a2Ks7Z04w+/yueWaDm/o2txC U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AoAACwIutb/5hdJa1jHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBUQcBAQsBgQ1IBSlmgQIxg26IGIt9k26FVIF6CwEBhQWDJSI0DQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0dC4VkaAFKAgQwJwSDNAGBHWSoPIEvhUCEY4wCF4F/gRAoH4pOMYImAo5uhjCKOAkCkSAYgViFBIoXgnSUYgIRFIEmHTiBVXAVZQGCQoM8AQmNE0GNM4EfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,229,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="201285158"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2018 19:19:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wADJJgFt016251 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:19:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:19:42 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:19:42 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: "Restart Signaling for IS-IS" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis
Thread-Index: AQHUe4XUghGsoUHRl06DFeAGPn2Z1Q==
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:19:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CAB36FB7-2D69-410B-BF8B-5DBC54FF2742@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CAB36FB72D69410BBF8B5DBC54FF2742ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.151, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/4OW-I-NrSOMTiQXLTHtaY10EqG0>
Subject: [Lsr] "Restart Signaling for IS-IS" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:19:46 -0000
All,
In preparation for WG last call, I’d like to know whether or not you’ve reviewed the draft (not whether you support it). If you haven’t reviewed it and would be willing to review it, please indicate that as well. I’m doing this since the author’s request for WG last call is coming fairly quickly by IETF standards. Note that the changes from RFC 5306 are (extracted from Appendix A):
This document extends RFC 5306 by introducing support for signalling
the neighbors of a restarting router that a planned restart is about
to occur. This allows the neighbors to be aware of the state of the
restarting router so that appropriate action may be taken if other
topology changes occur while the planned restart is in progress.
Since the forwarding plane of the restarting router is maintained
based upon the pre-restart state of the network, additional topology
changes introduce the possibility that traffic may be lost if paths
via the restarting router continue to be used while the restart is in
progress.
In support of this new functionality two new flags have been
introduced:
PR - Restart is planned
PA - Planned restart acknowledgement
No changes to the post restart exchange between the restarting router
and its neighbors have been introduced.
Thanks,
Acee
- [Lsr] "Restart Signaling for IS-IS" - draft-ietf-… Acee Lindem (acee)