[Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 July 2019 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C395C120133; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, acee@cisco.com, lsr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.99.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <156450145179.2648.3725497775262848285.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:44:11 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/6gakfkfbILE8uJ50qO4ALxuFwh4>
Subject: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:44:12 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sec 1: "This document updates [RFC5786] so that a router can also announce one or more local X-AF addresses using the corresponding Local Address sub-TLV. Routers using the Node Attribute TLV [RFC5786] can include non-TE enabled interface addresses in their OSPF TE advertisements, and also use the same sub-TLVs to carry X-AF information, facilitating the mapping described above." I wonder if this text should use normative language (s/can/MAY/) as this is the part that actually updates RFC5786, however, I didn't check the exact wording in RFC5786...
- [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Acee Lindem (acee)