IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 08 October 2019 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D424312008C; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=G60SK09F; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=J86SM1id
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkv4zCvgNDLc; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21EF120058; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1540; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1570556644; x=1571766244; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Zo5LAEMG9kyxy1HLvqC4tbiaDNUQr8LyYARVWHPyfhs=; b=G60SK09FfRtsou+M6XwcWfS5XEQyeQM9s5O7qFcMbqRU1azoK95CO+we sPXs9Y34cgS+H11+wouNDHzXOACx9EH9/rKLdUmv6J5RswS29+WUxoT+s Ll+4bgFID+sFd6rvHUJh/pyDwQhJ4EgcPhyH03hcuDSwD5FfOV4ZlkJ1Q A=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:dPXF9xyVWCSufubXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YRGN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A+GsHbIQKUhYEjcsMmAl1CcWIBGXwLeXhaGoxG8ERHFI=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BNAAAsypxd/4YNJK1mGwEBAQEBAQEFAQEBEQEBAwMBAQGBaQQBAQELAYFKUAOBQyAECyqEI4NHA4pLTYIPl32BLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAheCLiM2Bw4CAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYUtDIVLAQEBAQIBEhERDAEBKg0BDwIBCA4KAgImAgICMBUQAgQOBSKDAIFrAw4PAQKjTgKBOIhhdYEygn0BAQWFCBiCFwmBDCgBjA0YgX+BOB+CFzU+hESDDjKCJo84N51YCoIilRkbgjqLeosMp2MCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVkELoFYcBVlAYJBUBAUgU84gzuKU3SBKY9rAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,272,1566864000"; d="scan'208";a="339914308"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Oct 2019 17:44:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x98Hi32J031573 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:44:03 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:44:03 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:44:02 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:44:02 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZwouakexhP/HaJDt2s2mt3sUIYBfGbZF4W8CrAAExFff/SxuX81Fv/uCydxxGZN/qliesOAb9IPZ2dGujllEGeOM3/2uBF3XrFUIjm6gSgypkVagCEOhP7dZ8CBzoVgHkNoYfoPXtM2f4oxzh6x+HACHuAwd+LX2MUdsrvnLsJahk0gRqxgnhaQ3z8zFzbc3h5G827l1t9QzSsQcFKG5enuf21ckAma5fYJTqHQ6VSjRByH/D8csGmmhZCxoeadVqGjVjjaVzCBgNhXhGEypXTkosXe/FieynddwAxMtBEna6maGyqVfqDSa4Qcn0Ikmfo5b8DPrcrRgbJiwn552Zw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Zo5LAEMG9kyxy1HLvqC4tbiaDNUQr8LyYARVWHPyfhs=; b=CWH5Qy1uP14OSlNhUZXU/gdTZVOAIhl114c/4mIwFBPsLLoH1V2U8FQylxLkqBGGzeyOh3tffKlSvRx3AXP+wHOFHvzo8Qwx28YDfWbw11hIS1S6Qe7/OjoJwSBGKqpdYsQq5pCiSOprW60OnO8aMPryGi9ZeHN/0+Z7DDQqEmYCZCG/PIjpKXbJA2nOZujMhXOGX/szBRo05pfW/FEnCUQIUuFc3rOwm/85V+wF41X78+AVH15WYpUY5uCRLCvu6hhiYJycgXfvpe3taooXgdNN+RdVXu6aDHOFPIRsz/6KkJP7MO2X2MtaDRKUMt/okNcenrXY3tieH3An7Cqxyw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Zo5LAEMG9kyxy1HLvqC4tbiaDNUQr8LyYARVWHPyfhs=; b=J86SM1idJF90wSmW1Jg5XP+SQmHCt9N60H56O7ynUCFqZ9KCGXwsukifHghszJrxEVzCupvAQpqCVE5ti73JR7aECN0lumUgiF0xMEnUuhdLjJzy7zX4BayuNwj7OBEryy2DjstyEULxKT08DuccYUzEOOzu2amEkYgME6qVcn0=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3870.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.180.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2327.24; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:44:01 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::787e:8cf4:6217:9f56]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::787e:8cf4:6217:9f56%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2327.026; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 17:44:01 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
CC: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVeXEftTY4y0fTr0qQyxFBAZyTBadPJwaAgAFidoCAAAWqgIAAOtgA
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:44:01 +0000
Message-ID: <8BABE5C2-3EBC-47E2-B6A8-F4DC9257923C@cisco.com>
References: <157005547716.8852.9437110159615855482.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D52B6B66-3601-4E35-805F-164635009754@cisco.com> <1685E504-3537-4A88-8E79-74601F717BA0@chopps.org> <6C1E5E4D-5681-4C9A-AD7B-72FB65A4F59B@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <6C1E5E4D-5681-4C9A-AD7B-72FB65A4F59B@chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1006::11f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2e6868e1-31e5-4ce9-80a0-08d74c171ad1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3870:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3870B6A87D02CA9FD0D2333FC29A0@MN2PR11MB3870.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-forefront-prvs: 01842C458A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(4636009)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(446003)(4326008)(4744005)(81166006)(53546011)(229853002)(6436002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(36756003)(81156014)(2616005)(2906002)(476003)(6512007)(486006)(11346002)(6246003)(8936002)(186003)(6116002)(6506007)(8676002)(66476007)(66946007)(316002)(54906003)(91956017)(46003)(478600001)(76116006)(6916009)(102836004)(25786009)(6486002)(5660300002)(66446008)(256004)(64756008)(99286004)(76176011)(7736002)(86362001)(305945005)(14454004)(33656002)(66556008)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3870; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dNMX0iAx6sUSA5CmG07mndYHE5rJuW7UV3NVFNoEC/LtJwpNV/vm63pfy8sUUQzCIU/BUSaQCV3MuK8bC5sKv4bTPVz7cJTYcYDgFvEVLV3ZlrCS7/Is1R6zAd3GVgscPHC0gYhKMiQmE/CYC4bpVERHnq/8f+FgcIWHspOT/wU37aoPjobdgmfqUMeOcwIFct/tzP2iWTvPlPyPtbP3bYyhcbAikytlVC8/a+Ra4aRigtSAarno8muPflZTmQXlm/3+Je04/pPbE9RQS5f02FputCbO9OP7RrJOwPpatuMe60OQK/p1l9LQLetTCkmlpWW184/dQVX2P82hryFpuD7g9mTroYrBk4eX6th8CdUNiXXl4pTYQn4QZJpdYfLrLp1EcrAEBTIF3HLkqZbvhdrTRvzEgoeNsyUheai1meM=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <79663339D0DEED4F851C6186DE9DB72C@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2e6868e1-31e5-4ce9-80a0-08d74c171ad1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Oct 2019 17:44:01.2251 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xc6u5q69Pae8JzPHcm6SeNtI8tOMEZ9I6gdBswe4tWwg2Ra75EY1qUewUNxGuI8C
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3870
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/7EslRc2YS6QznujNB4PPWQtzhhY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:44:07 -0000

Hi Chris,
We made this change in -41.
Thanks,
Acee

On 10/8/19, 6:14 AM, "Christian Hopps" <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

    should have read "or it supports more than 32"
    
    > On Oct 8, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
    > 
    > This strikes me as one of these artificial limits that gains us almost nothing (what if the platform supports less than 32 or it supports 32?), and creates these backward incompatible YANG issues (ranges that have to change) that are part of what is driving the complexity in the YANG versioning stuff. Why don't we just have a no range u16 or a 1..max range?
    > Thanks,
    > Chris.
    > 
    >> On Oct 7, 2019, at 12:44 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
    >> 
    >>>  grouping spf-parameters {
    >>>    container spf-control {
    >>>        leaf paths {
    >>>          if-feature max-ecmp;
    >>>          type uint16 {
    >>>            range "1..32";
    >>>          }
    >> 
    >>   Why is this a uint16 rather than a uint8?
    >> 
    >> It definitely could be uint8.
    >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email