Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynamic flooding aware and not aware nodes
tony.li@tony.li Thu, 07 March 2019 15:09 UTC
Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945ED12788F for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1pYnt3qLrEDS for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A81124B19 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id m2so11475882pgl.5 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:09:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=3ycCxDm3/+yjpS1F4mEI0Es0/yzixfUKIi/4duKdeUA=; b=Nfu3Gr4HNTxrCpHBR0dCtLSwRh+cZxdVO7MYzEBsH6G9rLYkkfdGxtIUU063PoEkh+ C4kYqTOaTh9MhUddsCKdsy3WPL6/Qqy3nskVv6oTqiFNErXxpe6qguHzQWffiggB0f0X 9WEBn+sOO6yRpzsRD+/8WygooLCA7JokfpVOhKM9ghzKkCiMgsAIgQFlz0R9OQRFXHd8 +g9AEQZ9i96wt9htv//9jhVgPYgB+xSBFitxs6sYS8o7XiusZ4cOpHScs8ZkyZ9HXQMf UAY+BJWWiTf20gQa4jROTMfWwv5ctamdscSUf23RgU3n9o2OTYe8DZyUy9kiEFdHUsug YuAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=3ycCxDm3/+yjpS1F4mEI0Es0/yzixfUKIi/4duKdeUA=; b=YBRJsUTY/p3PEqel85wkD8laWAlK66CDfxQXH08c2Nu3jPm+bHJ8DYpCVh0o0T6aeq G0zrTrVGI5BekuUq+glyJFNmqS2TIvNJs2q0EzWJOz+T/zFIaXTr5QHtoYYRaZVNueRM VvDJ87SNrJBVe700NXA4N8H2aIWbeMo/Qhwtg55JB9jfI7MrZiTUID8HfRSNM/H+yykA MRkHz0jcTNU1/y4etpKpVpZLic+kgVtoRL6DrfGLXd1XCA4V29froVLvTspmlK9BfknZ HNkLz8FAOBw+nTFLsUVYSZibBsnSK4IgT1ADRynk8eWJA1mET3Vht/2XuCMuQfTxJ9D1 yfsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrOBPO4n2Dk2lFvmUQY8grYd+ebok30yqOBKx/A5vZQFFyiSh6 1Ysx4bR+KjQXhKCv5/0r2JY2MXkK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtYVm8lyAwKmbi0xrAcwlz3McAvSX65k9N97mKFWBDq9gPZp8YbYWtWcTPITQaoWolpFEzcw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6f09:: with SMTP id k9mr642102pgc.326.1551971377532; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (c-73-158-115-137.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.115.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v22sm13007148pfa.49.2019.03.07.07.09.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: tony.li@tony.li
Message-Id: <6AF967DC-E66A-4B89-9193-D9789E627E86@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C6678CD6-C2B9-4164-9EE8-943D8A7C0B05"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:09:35 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGBaoy1u+LRXkVTvy11SSXxm1a0QM4F+5qDPb2udUKf3w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, lsr@ietf.org
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <CAOj+MMGLC7S+Lz+2MtABniBqx9BA_cyeqUhR12SvUJn3ibWZUg@mail.gmail.com> <ceec44ec-b66c-6644-2bc4-aaf09225c224@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMGBaoy1u+LRXkVTvy11SSXxm1a0QM4F+5qDPb2udUKf3w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/8GjiDkWPkaMmH8Ij1qBdUTQOhA0>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynamic flooding aware and not aware nodes
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 15:09:40 -0000
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 3:16 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: > > And precisely to that point I have tried to indicate that if this is by design there is no point of including those 100s of TORs in constructing and distributing flooding graph. And to the point of the algorithm, including those 100s of TORs in constructing the graph is absolutely necessary. In the case where the TOR’s have a pair of upstream nodes, you want both of those upstream interfaces enabled for flooding. The upstream nodes do need to be told this. Tony
- [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynamic fl… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynami… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynami… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynami… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynami… tony.li
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynami… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on co-existance of dynami… tony.li