Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt
gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com Sat, 17 July 2021 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229793A208E; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUhkbREM3Czf; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxus.zteusa.com (mxus.zteusa.com [4.14.134.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35BB73A2090; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-us.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.36.11.29]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 865CE8223587309C4503; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:40:52 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mgapp02.zte.com.cn ([10.36.9.143]) by mse-us.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 16HKeolZ040669; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:40:50 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com)
Received: from mapi (mgapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid81; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:40:50 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:40:50 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa60f340525e04c495
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202107180440504956563@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com
To: ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
Cc: ginsberg@cisco.com, draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con.authors@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-us.zte.com.cn 16HKeolZ040669
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/8K8TOnksXJeUSEsq0zMhzzM-gHY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 20:41:00 -0000
Dear All, I concur with the arguments presented by Les and Peter. Perhaps the Editors of the WG draft will update the document accordingly. Regards, Greg Mirsky Sr. Standardization Expert 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division E: gregory.mirsky@ztetx.com www.zte.com.cn ------------------Original Mail------------------ Sender: PeterPsenak To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg);lsr@ietf.org;draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con.authors@ietf.org; Date: 2021/07/14 01:40 Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt Hi, I'm the co-author of this draft and I have tried to convince the rest of the co-authors that encoding the new Generic Metric sub-TLV only as a application independent value is wrong. Unfortunately, my efforts have failed. As a result, although unwillingly, I have to express my opinions here and let the WG decide. 1) The usage of the Generic Metric sub-TLV is likely going to be associated with the applications, Flex-algo being the first one. Generic Metric sub-TLV can not be used by IGP's native calculation. So having Generic Metric being encoded only in legacy TLV does not make much sense. 2) TE-metric is defined as application specific attribute by RFC 8919/8920 and can be advertised in ASLA. The application specific value advertisement of TE-metric has been already proved in the field. Generic Metric is semantically very similar to TE-metric, so I see no reason why application specific encoding should not be supported. 3) Flex-algo specification mandates the usage of the ASLA attributes and all of the attributes that we are using for flex-algo so far are encoded in ALSA. Encoding the Generic Metric outside of ALSA violates that principle. 4) RFC 8919/8920 violation brought by Les below. thanks, Peter On 13/07/2021 17:39, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: > Draft authors - > > I note that the new version has altered the advertisement of the Generic Metric sub-TLV so that it is no longer supported in the ASLA sub-TLV. > This is in direct violation of RFC 8919/8920. > > For example, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8919.html#section-6.1 states: > > "New applications that future documents define to make use of the advertisements defined in this document MUST NOT make use of legacy advertisements." > > Flex-algo is a "new application" in the scope of these RFCs. > > Please correct this error. > > Thanx. > > Les > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lsr On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org >> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 9:12 AM >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >> Cc: lsr@ietf.org >> Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. >> >> Title : Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and >> Constraints >> Authors : Shraddha Hegde >> William Britto A J >> Rajesh Shetty >> Bruno Decraene >> Peter Psenak >> Tony Li >> Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01.txt >> Pages : 27 >> Date : 2021-07-12 >> >> Abstract: >> Many networks configure the link metric relative to the link >> capacity. High bandwidth traffic gets routed as per the link >> capacity. Flexible algorithms provides mechanisms to create >> constraint based paths in IGP. This draft documents a generic metric >> type and set of bandwidth related constraints to be used in Flexible >> Algorithms. >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con/ >> >> There is also an htmlized version available at: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-01 >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> Lsr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
- [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con… internet-drafts
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… gregory.mirsky
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Ron Bonica
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Ron Bonica
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw… Gyan Mishra