[Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 03 December 2018 14:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5823C130E19; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:42:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, acee@cisco.com, lsr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154384812235.18300.11710871832133431074.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 06:42:02 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/AIgRa0sCDpu5LgxfhWfeaCbGXMo>
Subject: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 14:42:03 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Minor comments: 1) In intro: "...while an adjacency segment, in most cases, is a one-hop path." Is that true, that in _most_ cases it is one hop? I though SR makes most sense in order to specify routers/hops that need to be visited, not matter how many hops are in between. 2) The contributor section has the following statement: "The following people gave a substantial contribution to the content of this document and should be considered as co-authors:" Should this section then not be called "Authors" instead?
- [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-iet… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)