[Lsr] Clarification on inconsistency between RFC7794 and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
"Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> Wed, 24 February 2021 06:24 UTC
Return-Path: <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BEC3A0977; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:24:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.57, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZhXksqYXrZzJ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR05-DB8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db8eur05on2116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.20.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD67F3A0962; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:24:49 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GPkQS9iEmxxk47RBqwHiPQRqivE3N5ERVzQRlzNLAbWpcRdb0OjHufOooygCG/AhaOgjza8t8+URQFptbd6dbXyf3GUp5vMxFrq44732GkxecZJrFGOGgbZh6GK3MPAqZI7BF6zVcf77g5XNe04dQFNzG9P5NQ9YK81ExxcjOyFczZMBUV8cy7GdLTXXr7vyDBAwofcxNXMD0OnT0bcZrmbFTIqNlviIyPl7cfFkAO3f+e8HT7AxbXbx+4BX7eZ5OXbhy9LaexpVSda5CJGdQVeZ2YYy0MzgFAnz5Li5HJa8XGeSipIQFUxlajqrAww1ajmwCN/JzNRU9gEKHv/Jag==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3uc/vOv/iO/ETfV8ev6Mpk7x0hNQnwoZdzyymDYJong=; b=aXRqz6HsE6f5W3ZVtSKKfVGFvxTzsPBUi9T+WNWht61MI+G/qaPoykkiK6Eb/VBvo6GRglgkIM67tdm0/L3NEZw+Ne7s7cCPW7vWOvj0Lt2UZ5sX4hI3jOCA6gy5ze0u0F3TLftWKwdCyNggbndbRINIlNbsBVLMdO9Z2MVcp5G+Z01mEg28Ix1uvU9omKy0SSNfAcd/DqgbQI0jmhcHzbt+TjLsWL6za+0+deurKy7+yw+QDKJkEbwqghoiP5zvgUteTJLxveZ5fHCJwuzelM0VQA0v9F8Kzd3xi3dH6CyJM1jlHlbHvegKeUTvvyDV7iXTEUgSBRxKGzVw2PV4oQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3uc/vOv/iO/ETfV8ev6Mpk7x0hNQnwoZdzyymDYJong=; b=aoIAKBgTlcYbQBbRFhzZIPqOCHLBkkfgEM0C9kJhIGfwkn/k6ID3mT5eQaMkdgRpMgvps1Ivp6b/tfRPjWrkbWOCgG8yeCcRnvZKawKDesNOM+V/fFdX/qNlquqBEJb3lYhUkmh3yPYi0P0a0L+iC82Ag8wTuSRtgas+ARL+Rno=
Received: from AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:144::23) by AM4PR0701MB2244.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:200:54::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3890.8; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:24:47 +0000
Received: from AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5978:ed2b:7cae:e555]) by AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5978:ed2b:7cae:e555%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3890.016; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:24:47 +0000
From: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
To: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Clarification on inconsistency between RFC7794 and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
Thread-Index: AdcKdQrZK0qw4ydZSAiQZgUFd9/T0g==
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:24:47 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR07MB6386C5C8AD58755D858650B0E09F9@AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [103.40.135.162]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d7102262-e3a2-41a5-304e-08d8d88ce1ff
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM4PR0701MB2244:
x-ms-exchange-minimumurldomainage: ietf.org#9482
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM4PR0701MB22443303DDE4B71813533FBAE09F9@AM4PR0701MB2244.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39850400004)(76116006)(66556008)(66946007)(110136005)(66476007)(64756008)(316002)(66446008)(71200400001)(9686003)(166002)(55016002)(478600001)(86362001)(83380400001)(66574015)(33656002)(6506007)(8676002)(26005)(2906002)(7696005)(186003)(8936002)(4326008)(52536014)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM0PR07MB6386C5C8AD58755D858650B0E09F9AM0PR07MB6386eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM0PR07MB6386.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d7102262-e3a2-41a5-304e-08d8d88ce1ff
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Feb 2021 06:24:47.0777 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 9SLo7XPz9j0/rNeur034bQzKnpSeMgVZTP87nc1HRVXY+ddlLuyYJbiVLEuuycRDAK0bmNaNIX3I8BuAm/aUt69ViK1EPDX75RxJ2NaEIS8=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM4PR0701MB2244
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/s2P373HA2_eiU2qOekVoRDPuZCY>
Subject: [Lsr] Clarification on inconsistency between RFC7794 and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:24:55 -0000
Hi Peter, All,
I'm am trying to clarify a potential inconsistency between RFC7794 and draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions.
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions says that we should advertise identical prefix-attribute tlv for the ipv6 reachability tlv and for the locator tlv.
RFC7794 document says that we should not set the X flag in case of ipv6 routes because the ipv6 reachability tlv already has an external indication.
Can you advise.
1. draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
The Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV can be carried in the SRv6 Locator
TLV as well as the Prefix Reachability TLVs. When a router
originates both the Prefix Reachability TLV and the SRv6 Locator TLV
for a given prefix, and the router is originating the Prefix
Attribute Flags Sub-TLV in one of the TLVs, the router SHOULD
advertise identical versions of the Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV in
both TLVs.
1. RFC7794
Prefix Attribute Flags
Type: 4
Length: Number of octets of the Value field.
Value:
(Length * 8) bits.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...
|X|R|N| ...
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...
Bits are defined/sent starting with Bit 0 defined below. Additional
bit definitions that may be defined in the future SHOULD be assigned
in ascending bit order so as to minimize the number of bits that will
need to be transmitted.
Undefined bits MUST be transmitted as 0 and MUST be ignored on
receipt.
Bits that are NOT transmitted MUST be treated as if they are set to 0
on receipt.
X-Flag: External Prefix Flag (Bit 0)
Set if the prefix has been redistributed from another protocol.
This includes the case where multiple virtual routers are
supported and the source of the redistributed prefix is another
IS-IS instance.
The flag MUST be preserved when leaked between levels.
In TLVs 236 and 237, this flag SHOULD always be sent as 0 and MUST
be ignored on receipt. This is because there is an existing X
flag defined in the fixed format of these TLVs as specified in
[RFC5308<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5308>] and [RFC5120<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5120>].
G/
- [Lsr] Clarification on inconsistency between RFC7… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on inconsistency between … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on inconsistency between … Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Clarification on inconsistency between … Peter Psenak