Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1-03

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

From: Lsr <[e-mail]> on behalf of Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>
Sent: 05 January 2021 09:19

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-isis-yang-augmentation-v1/

Please indicate your support or objection by January 19th, 2021.

<tp>

Object, strongly.

In an earlier version, there was one YANG module and the accompanying text related to that module.

A second YANG module has been dropped into the I-D while the text is untouched.  Thus
the Abstract is wrong
the Introduction is wrong
IANA Considerations  are wrong
and so on.

This second module lacks references while introducing technical objects such as udabm-length or r-flag with no indication where in the 68 documents credited to the LSR WG (plus those of ISO) information may be found to judge whether or not the YANG is suitable.

The security considerations is out-of-date, the references do not reflect RFC published last year, YANG import lack references, the key references are listed as Informative.

And, contrary to the announcement, the intended status of the I-D is  Informational.

I am surprised that anyone should consider this to be in a state fit for adoption!

Tom Petch


Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,
Chris.