[Lsr] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-invalid-tlv/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It might be helpful to define “ignore” as “skip the number of octets indicated
by the length field.” An alternate interpretation might skip the number of
bytes implied by the type code, if the type is known.

Similarly, I take it that a length value beyond the end of the message ends
processing of the PDU, but the PDU as a whole MUST NOT be discarded.