IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs - draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Fri, 10 June 2022 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85229C1649C6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uxDKsCksuts6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4AAC15D89A for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id q18so23077885pln.12 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=S4G0f+0I9uvC4DeQbTr7klqEqN0IJxv3JFLtdv68OGc=; b=R4ew1IITjqFO/X3PNz6Rus4BsO6jCAC7zlsRPuKwaaQE87XnpZVL9NO2GKAmooOopf OwNvZz4xVF5QDhGM2i9a9FsFGV7kGlWafpirRnCICafteNn18fUHGUmKJWqHbgznTrRG sMaNfNErZXx5eliiDkxQax2M5fRyGFIOZTGQP38YljgZH0dzc/ST9hHxtfUc0JFtaJNx JPA8r8X4XjdnNqes+44NLn8+7gCEzgryKqxgsDoFUUK+Wqf4wvRdHOaIKcQ1En0iRS9P plXs2PMPwWPd19Z6PKRdk+FsdZTwUV6e/oME4ooX7CP75Vn0T9AV1mPZlTMd4TIMAqnf HXIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=S4G0f+0I9uvC4DeQbTr7klqEqN0IJxv3JFLtdv68OGc=; b=t0FqEtjhN5lY1OMBAsbbDXdeV4Vxd1GNnxsuz+tBRXxNqdvRw31dX1FtJTQQb2BZhK SOHnXO2IkVmvngqn6RdOtosdDG9EBY3GN/Dq8i5g1GPE4NWhxyJSBQ27gzIOmmvFIp8O q0CvtEhdhiD4o32KsHW9HkO7+Z/vXbWcMjUfcmE78RtQ0MWJMTUo36/DkIsgVU3cGLUR juqFxylycIh/A1NhVfMt2NwrG6MKYddzXNMi+OALvtUfjvuupU6NqqHhAZWQWkGInolL PH9JtDA6vROii1hgNfqp+eE6qwI28Z6qZuQYuVXhmgaydbkwpqkdNq7RhjL+MGnISXek zIWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532M+Sy0Y4fT91kTn6iviv/NF8ujol4fO3cTf9RHhCQgFfsn13kf Dmaj9byi02ydpkeswtSx8APyi6kEArY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC/quhkXxBrY4ZXatVSy3WqI9u+t2Iv6cx6VdPtO98DCLSPaHzynzz7I5gh/fHH7h7miMtoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6b45:b0:1e3:3cfa:3104 with SMTP id x5-20020a17090a6b4500b001e33cfa3104mr390255pjl.113.1654876609572; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8-20020a638f48000000b00401a9bc0f33sm2930389pgn.85.2022.06.10.08.56.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <E4E0CB67-617B-4A92-B351-273F8CC61185@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9E481EA3-D94D-4F7B-8744-86EFBD7B3667"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:56:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <AC1AF8B2-07D5-46CB-85B9-DC8607C5E88B@cisco.com>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <AC1AF8B2-07D5-46CB-85B9-DC8607C5E88B@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/KI2zjndGWh59oamhiPUS4zLWW6o>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs - draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:56:54 -0000

Hi Acee,

Yes, the Arista implementation shipped.

T


> On Jun 10, 2022, at 7:10 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Initially, there was a lot interest and energy in reducing the flooding overhead in dense drafts. Now, it seems the interest and energy has waned. IMO, this draft contains some very valuable extensions to the IGPs. I discussed this with the editors and one suggestion was to go ahead and publish the draft as “Experimental”. However, before doing this I’d like to get the WG’s opinion on making it experimental rather standards track. Additionally, I know there were some prototype implementations. Have any of those been productized? 
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org <mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email