Re: [Lsr] [draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-08] Clarification on ASLA usage for flex-algo

[Sarah Chen <[e-mail]>]

Thank you, Peter, for the clarification.

It would be nice to add a reference to the section number Section 4.2
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7810#section-4.2>.

Thanks,
Sarah

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:56 AM Peter Psenak <ppsenak=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Tony,
>
> On 10/08/2020 16:21, [e-mail] wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> >
> >>> The flex-algo draft mentions "Min Unidirectional Link Delay as
> >>> defined in [RFC7810 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7810>]". When
> >>> reading RFC7810, I found two Sub-TLVs:
> >>> 4.1. Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV 4.2. Min/Max Unidirectional
> >>> Link Delay Sub-TLV
> >>> Could you please clarify which one should be used? If "Min/Max
> >>> Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV" is used, will the max delay
> >>> carried in the subTLV be ignored?
> >>
> >> flex-algo as defined in the draft uses "Min Unidirectional Link
> >> Delay", which is advertised in the "Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay
> >> Sub-TLV".
> >>
> >> The fact that the "Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay Sub-TLV" carries
> >> some other data (e.g. Max delay) is orthogonal to the flex-algo usage.
> >
> >
> > Could we please clarify this by adding a reference to the specific
> section?
>
> which specific section do you have in mind?
>
> thanks,
> Peter
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tony
> >
>
>