Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call IPR Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints"

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com> Tue, 20 February 2024 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2565FC165518; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:49:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9V7PErUKdqt; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:49:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33ECC1519BB; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:49:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-42e28e0e879so2156131cf.2; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:49:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708444193; x=1709048993; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yibL8bl+inSGClcNOjiI4havevrJ25xCJrN4Fx+NwV8=; b=cPMqkNi/8NGpA8v+vZvqK87ggkAXS+pj1+ourfiSjkvVrMRi8Zonz7wIms8zi4ZUa/ IxsPPDibSnE9swGTQvRjPOKcRCsJf6s3S5SJGtuGkD/BZXPOEQBsq7VXQ56m/5b2hdEd 2vsrrt/c89v/2ZXZvHO2meWln4yQHUzdrmFIvQuPOWEZv4xM57WvyA3N35tKhoJ8sjzv T9BHyjUzGgFFGY5WIkKYo88OOJSqSEzzhgR6EdjP7WszQu+3tx11n/Fl8PTnUPSEQ2iO Hqj4c7EPc4cUi+qUoIzBZi2vgoVNZKADR0uUh9tRd4YLQm2SO84DBSU72NMVhRQ5xMm/ 7dNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708444193; x=1709048993; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yibL8bl+inSGClcNOjiI4havevrJ25xCJrN4Fx+NwV8=; b=EIYj3Gx0GKb7LAiHYbaptEUzPViad5Zg6b4Dvpx2yagT7C2Wa4RzFqODzA5aUKSP9q vY8q3Izut8/c9g51hYfnYu35Yq8T5ThHc1NdMWldR/das8JnMZ9QKZI495vuKpokg6wf wM4jrABg9LEPXQyC0jBdUxZeMHnyyL2/uOix+ryd+A7AhPAVcnRtoHRLVtp+M4zUQJeT xF5G51cPByB4YzqGUbLrkzm8BxfTBfADpViopd5nvnqwJlYH8RCdr1q5RVYwM3ukltJC kSBccqqFJRY00AvBpEQIy2TmKBN4lxHsgoNuCIrsOHnNdcAbaOqQnUGAkLU+QfYQisFW CTGA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX/ZshmT9Gq2G2gC2G1UmtqlYI0+jDzkdM5Te3Tm3chRJgl2swnog5QGNofFoX+KYtC4+mlP+XT0usu+1E=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEzN9qaMhopF+gZg3vW9MKUSJULDefZC+2A261E3kpVDIrr4r4 zg26k/Db2CV5CvJtv5D7ikq+HgZNmYbPp+3S47FDBPLMv7/r6/REAtTuSAFW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEnPJKaPZdM9XJQdJ479RV0O9BFeCjc35ru4c8ToUd8JZuZS4CsEIhL0QPOuYdhtweDdX3PPA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7e8e:0:b0:42d:aeea:c148 with SMTP id w14-20020ac87e8e000000b0042daeeac148mr19409676qtj.29.1708444193379; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:49:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([136.54.28.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kk12-20020a05622a2c0c00b0042c7145fd19sm3558988qtb.12.2024.02.20.07.49.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FD676CC8-7C5F-4F2F-8975-8F53FBE0A869@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:49:41 -0500
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F561A50D-9793-49F6-9314-4D67580BE83A@gmail.com>
References: <FD676CC8-7C5F-4F2F-8975-8F53FBE0A869@gmail.com>
To: William Britto A J <bwilliam@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/NyGFpTvTm65NNO-LYmWH5KOhcao>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call IPR Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints"
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:49:59 -0000

All,

Note that the original IPR Poll Email is incorrect. There are no IPR disclosures and the link below points
to disclosures for Dynamic Flooding and should have been removed when I pasted it. 

However, I have already received a response from everyone but William Britto. 

Thanks,
Acee



> On Feb 19, 2024, at 5:20 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Co-Authors, 
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-07.txt?  
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules  (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are a few IPR statements already - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> Also, we have six authors and four from the same company. Please verify that all co-authors should be included as such.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr