Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call on "Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in OSPF" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-03

Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 May 2022 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6322C15E6F3; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Nq0sYg0vLfW; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21ECFC1594AD; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id w124so2090959vsb.8; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BLsnTiXUGuRDREK8Q/en58sAnHeOGMte00OW0Q9fxLw=; b=horwWiAeLm4Rr9UMVv7jrcSUIbsg1lyLYbIW6800eu6pAvT5q4fFnoCixmYrbsRgSY /Ppy8AkZ0QOv+NuPtHw1AFHjn15RvBoGmskz1prUHcRiJg5Smj8xy7nRMbBNTG4fctO6 zD4ZfB9e7tz3hNV73XAh4P5oXntVCjEqVirP5vK5KewmkjyFCL24dDossKhy9HPXjym4 owO1TJ5v03Yy1ePjCt4d/hPWHKJ7amIwEa2sgkhzJCsJ73H1dv72tPPaXXLO5HOv9U6N Owlz5hURU3OejzIPKiJhuNMn020QCg/D/3NHZ0Hma7bP4qoDqmrdere3NzdpU7fvF+a9 LmGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BLsnTiXUGuRDREK8Q/en58sAnHeOGMte00OW0Q9fxLw=; b=3VVwF9zwTHXDfkLZQa33MbwqfHiUBmDsx9CWR5G6rdzbbU//veWbQ0oI7gO9hcr9AJ tDPYCl6Dv2gnugbfdALRXFmUoJ+HQBt9ncbbYAC4zClBgJpYDaHmuxwawMThSxWYQfE/ CbLFElLAgX9hFZt6XexeKYxD/r7CdSlsVOGA/vhuLLEgMe/3/wTrofuooR4bqh+L7yba DIhzM5XcLhTEMpx3BEAHkQRQ5tVEfYbgmX8P/7Kh68ZgrRXE5rHIc5UPPIEY7vZirod6 a3e3onHIdbUmBU3b2Mg9lVFhWMykZFSLA6xmf6xZ/pougRJYzS9uzY8pnhpz1KvStpRk TaaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AwLyLTDumVMH2CCJ2F0Qe8xmrD9bucFGJvyRrJ7IipTx/EYVA NCD0OAKFpVa6m2Ml3rr4yVt0VWHrDOi7c6j2xfGp7j31
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEqnnPh04k1NUN+wg5x160U9oIUgQIE7aYqCp8wqmH9lVktab+9mKO+SGSXXriktsaYZjFDcnAaAMJzYyjgdY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3007:b0:32d:7d5c:e801 with SMTP id s7-20020a056102300700b0032d7d5ce801mr13493143vsa.34.1652277863759; Wed, 11 May 2022 07:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <823612D6-E167-42EC-87F9-2C7F603CD2F2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <823612D6-E167-42EC-87F9-2C7F603CD2F2@cisco.com>
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:34:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CAH6gdPw9bpV1yEtskWduiJ1A1jJkPTxyu8_p3VC1Zpmnkja6Sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023c2db05debceb8c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/OikFpjx3Prs4O916SEIIXIz8pZs>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call on "Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in OSPF" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-03
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:04:26 -0000

Hi Acee,

Thanks for your detailed review and we've incorporated all of the edits
suggested by you. They would reflect on the next update.

Please also check inline below for response.


On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:14 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Speaking as Document Shepherd and WG member:
>
>
>
> Hi Ketan, Peter,
>
>
>
> I support this work. I didn’t have comments other than editorial. I’ve
> attached a diff.
>
>
>
>    1. Used the correct designation for OSPF IANA registry names, i.e.,
>    Sub-TLVs vs sub-TLVs.
>    2. There were multiple variations of “L2 Bundle Member” including “L2
>    Bundle Member”, “L2 Bundle member”, and L2 bundle member. I used “L2 Bundle
>    Member” when referring to a specific TLV, Sub-TLV, or protocol field and
>    “L2 bundle member” when used to refer generally to the member.
>
> KT> Ack. Fixed accordingly.

Thanks,
Ketan


>
>    1. I’m not opposed to “Bundle” capitalized and not “member” but would
>    like to understand the reasoning.
>    2. I reworded the “Security Considerations” to make the glass full
>    rather than empty.
>
>
>
> I believe the IANA section is consistent with our current OSPF registries.
> We certainly don’t want to try and recreate the OSPFv3 Extended LSA
> protocol specifications in the IANA registry.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)"
> <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 1:51 PM
> *To: *"lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *"draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles@ietf.org" <
> draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Lsr] Working Group Last Call on "Advertising L2 Bundle Member
> Link Attributes in OSPF" - draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-03
>
>
>
> This begins a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-l2bundles.
> While there hasn’t been as much discussion as I would like on the draft,
>  it is filling a gap in OSPF corresponding to IS-IS Link Bundles (RFC
> 8668).  Please review and send your comments, support, or objection to this
> list before 12 AM UTC on May 20th, 2022.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
>
>
>
>