IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse" - draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-07.txt

<olivier.dugeon@orange.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F521203F7; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxHVzfhJMR7P; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta136.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 403481203D1; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44g7ft4YxXz10Ps; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.23]) by opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 44g7ft47gxz8sY5; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILM6E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.31.63) by OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.13.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:43:34 +0200
Received: from [10.193.71.29] (10.168.234.2) by OPEXCLILM6E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.31.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:43:33 +0200
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse@ietf.org>
References: <94A0009A-16FC-40C9-B50A-8C2301CB90B5@cisco.com>
From: olivier.dugeon@orange.com
Organization: Orange Labs
Message-ID: <16572_1555004614_5CAF7CC6_16572_4_1_a60c9181-582e-39f8-97df-b41517e210b9@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:43:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <94A0009A-16FC-40C9-B50A-8C2301CB90B5@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------77F156408F1F3DE1AF085782"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Originating-IP: [10.168.234.2]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/PmYm-undJNGOxFDarrRzkJzLneI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Link Traffic Engineering (TE) Attribute Reuse" - draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-07.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:43:38 -0000

Hi,

I'm not in favour of this draft.

As already mention, I don't see the interest to duplicate TE attributes in new Extended Link Opaque LSA. For me, it is only a matter of implementation to look at various place in the OSPF TE Database to take Traffic Engineering information.

>From an operator perspective, it is already hard to manage TE attribute and I'm pretty sure that we could not ask network management team to maintain 2 systems for certainly a long period of time as many TE attributes remains in the standard Opaque LSA Traffic Engineering.

Regards

Olivier


Le 11/04/2019 à 18:11, Acee Lindem (acee) a écrit :
>
>  LSR Working Group,
>
>  
>
> This begins a two week  WG last call for the subject document. Please enter your support or objection to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Friday, April 27^th , 2019.
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
> Acee 
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email