[Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt
Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 09 January 2024 23:34 UTC
Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE22C1519A6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:34:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id orwEV81UsN6U for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2C6C151090 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3bbd1f9e0b8so2837828b6e.0 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:34:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704843275; x=1705448075; darn=ietf.org; h=date:to:references:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:sender:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5+NOqVvnXpo5c0yUEN26y0fBSKmezxSdZJ6fKFsd9Wc=; b=LxidM/9xp6AR0EdOa6QsrYrgB7NdIr/HdVooPHjh0JPR03LdU8EQH9N/8jJBQLQNAH X2k183p+KFA2p+OBpF4oLn3v4gvXJZrIqyengC6Ve5CTExaMYEQRO/008Lg+mm4k+SU9 LO/G2PPLxs0X4nHoAvT1vgLKLETte9ob7HuTc74meuQpdhdA14ZAQdFycOhJdERf7uYm eYSSgqfOsZaCYYMVIGLVPdMWd2nKe1RyTq4+IBA/yCV/lGf7mhYTU370wh8DnqBSiBzj GluLowzQNakoXXlHRUGoqoAdpQIE2cX0ntKBwSZFXTrCvrcHNZQYin2ucUi2EHwPT1hP P9MQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704843275; x=1705448075; h=date:to:references:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5+NOqVvnXpo5c0yUEN26y0fBSKmezxSdZJ6fKFsd9Wc=; b=NAGKGTqn2LTjzHuxSQ7NGouA2DU5fp0hz6JwfXKlucv8iXfYO1SS39XPBibhgQ9GX/ aslKGL2678OyZgZd6LqMJ0or9/IVGewyYYIM5JRH85cBXh4SQMn8DqMwpVzugd/r4eB3 LjHrIF8o7ss/MQKpqwZ9hJpWARo5joXv0ggcqJO1Jy0fiiSqe/8hMl5P/E92swdW+SR6 npNcxxShhevPMvxagk/VQ5NtM0qhOm1nG2f2yd7eA1nOf5r8JzAsKYuvziaQX3FMKnmB D7E6w89eODeMwpmKaYhg64g6DcXRUysd1z2u5o8a2tE2nlfAWyVjwWdtoZWMVWVteiBe H9IQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxW0eTHyW88IaCEXdJ8njCXofumanp8qKOfQVvMGtu6Vgxm4B8G E7cmaJR1tpXBT5eQCEahf+XtsfT5w0I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE8pjQAYAv5VIhGwInKB8KuwasVkVKzeeuR9tkjEUVZdB2rtzSs+dUveX6CCOCg4NFVuF7+TQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1392:b0:3bd:4836:f25 with SMTP id c18-20020a056808139200b003bd48360f25mr60235oiw.63.1704843275422; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-158-206-100.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.206.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hq17-20020a056a00681100b006da96503d9fsm2202025pfb.109.2024.01.09.15.34.34 for <lsr@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_02CB5E5C-841F-49E1-BD53-1AD6374AEEAD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\))
Message-Id: <05AA8D9B-AD59-493A-9B28-D7B2516F276F@tony.li>
References: <170484314418.56200.1589339352617315028@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:34:24 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Qe3H1JD5rCv-A-0uqS010hPhAGU>
Subject: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 23:34:39 -0000
Hi, This version addresses the comments from the IESG review. Other comments? Regards, Tony > Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt > Date: January 9, 2024 at 3:32:24 PM PST > To: "Gyan S. Mishra" <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>, "Gyan Mishra" <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>, "Sarah Chen" <sarahchen@arista.com>, "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>, "Vivek Ilangovan" <ilangovan@arista.com> > > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt has been > successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy > Revision: 11 > Title: Area Proxy for IS-IS > Date: 2024-01-09 > Group: lsr > Pages: 20 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy/ > HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy > Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11 > > Abstract: > > Link state routing protocols have hierarchical abstraction already > built into them. However, when lower levels are used for transit, > they must expose their internal topologies to each other, leading to > scale issues. > > To avoid this, this document discusses extensions to the IS-IS > routing protocol that allow level 1 areas to provide transit, yet > only inject an abstraction of the level 1 topology into level 2. > Each level 1 area is represented as a single level 2 node, thereby > enabling greater scale. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > >