[Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (5287)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 14 March 2018 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C03F120227 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vIgapiDGcQNb for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699C3120047 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EBD1EB80C95; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: lberger@labn.net, ibryskin@advaoptical.com, alex.zinin@alcatel-lucent.com, none@rfc-editor.org, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, akr@cisco.com, acee@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: angelos.a.vassiliou@gmail.com, lsr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180314171705.EBD1EB80C95@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/TJu7H0TV14jQanEqG71Ls3_zIBw>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:19:35 -0700
Subject: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (5287)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:17:07 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250,
"The OSPF Opaque LSA Option".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5287

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Angelos Vassiliou <angelos.a.vassiliou@gmail.com>

Section: 7

Original Text
-------------
inter-area procedures described in Section 6 of this document.

Corrected Text
--------------
inter-area procedures described in Section 5 of this document.

Notes
-----
Inter-Area Considerations are discussed in Section 5, not Section 6.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
Publication Date    : July 2008
Author(s)           : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG