[Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CCB13101B; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOe9KwGIfqDm; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 183B8130E71; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4592; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531861960; x=1533071560; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=65psZSehX0C4AZal62oWcuyH3Fm3RPYmvxU4H+Ybt2o=; b=IQdBGxgcSxV9RtQZ43dvL5RuHnP1rN4KsH8eOPlX8qGagK154H5K8fdl S8gLw4Mhgv/8KwuSenDlbk4wG+L4ewap3pgaoEG7ffpHtRRMbuXPswHkw ygMWu+V0ImHWN3O1W99PWr3UmD/EYhcXs13w58xDv0qrg4EK+8L0gsjuN c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AbAgAtW05b/4MNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJTdmN/KAqDc5RBkjaFD4F6CyOESRmCWSE2FgECAQECAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?CbRwMhWBWEgEMPgIEMCcEAQ2DJQGBG2QPqxyBLooiBYkCghaBEAEnhgMChGE?= =?us-ascii?q?xgiQCmVwJAo8ljWWRbQIRFIEkJAMugVJwFWUBgj6LFYU+bwGLdoEaAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,367,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="425180835"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jul 2018 21:12:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6HLCc4f013743 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:12:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:12:38 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:12:38 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts
Thread-Index: AQHUHhLjBjIGQ10dKEqcjFCqvy8BDg==
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:12:38 +0000
Message-ID: <94B9CD28-E087-4A58-B51C-52A8B7D0715E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.123.54]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94B9CD28E0874A58B51C52A8B7D0715Eciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Uxa82hkLqslBCThs-jwObQV5_EE>
Subject: [Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:12:57 -0000

Authors of LSR MPLS ELC Signaling Drafts,

Now that we have https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt on the RFC queue waiting on a MISREF for Segment Routing MPLS, it seems we should move forward with these drafts.

However, it seems that we should advertise an Entropy RLD rather than a generic RLD to be aligned with the terminology in the MPLS draft (soon to be RFC).

Thanks,
Acee