[Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-13: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. I have a single non-blocking
COMMENT (question):

In section 5, if the SABM and UDABM lengths are either 0, 4 or 8, then I wonder
why the "SABM Length" and "UDABM Length" fields are 8 bits. In control plane,
using 2 or 3 bits length would not have a performance impact and would allow
for a longer Reserved header field.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric