Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6823 (7084)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Tue, 16 August 2022 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7546BC157B35 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QoU3f139cZ2I for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E409FC14CF0C for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA554280C0F; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HregWK1LbGX8; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 903AD4243EF9; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220814150045.80F7B4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:58 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E65A456-65B6-4383-A949-DF4AD8577D71@amsl.com>
References: <20220814150045.80F7B4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: keepplaying37@gmail.com, ginsberg@cisco.com, sprevidi@cisco.com, imc.shand@gmail.com, lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/WRJZMwfSelP67XiEoLAp71-IIgY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6823 (7084)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:50:00 -0000

Greetings,

Errata 7084 has been deleted because the text reported in not in the RFC/Section listed.
Please submit a new errata with	the correct RFC/Section.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs



> On Aug 14, 2022, at 8:00 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6823,
> "Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7084
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Keep <keepplaying37@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: Global
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Rosen,  E.,  "Exterior  Gateway  Protocol,"  IEN-209,   Bolt
>>         Beranek and Newman Inc., August 1982.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Rosen,  E.,  "Exterior  Gateway  Protocol,"  IEN-209,   Bolt
>>         Beranek and Newman Inc., August 1982, not issued
> 
> Notes
> -----
>> RFC823 references IEN-209, which was not issued, and won't be (https://www.rfc-editor.org/ien/scanned/ien209.pdf). I encourage discussion of whether it should reference RFC827 instead.
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party 
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6823 (draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS
>> Publication Date    : December 2012
>> Author(s)           : L. Ginsberg, S. Previdi, M. Shand
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6823 (draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS
> Publication Date    : December 2012
> Author(s)           : L. Ginsberg, S. Previdi, M. Shand
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>