Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6823 (7084)
Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Tue, 16 August 2022 01:50 UTC
Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7546BC157B35 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QoU3f139cZ2I for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E409FC14CF0C for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA554280C0F; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HregWK1LbGX8; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 903AD4243EF9; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220814150045.80F7B4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:49:58 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E65A456-65B6-4383-A949-DF4AD8577D71@amsl.com>
References: <20220814150045.80F7B4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: keepplaying37@gmail.com, ginsberg@cisco.com, sprevidi@cisco.com, imc.shand@gmail.com, lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/WRJZMwfSelP67XiEoLAp71-IIgY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6823 (7084)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:50:00 -0000
Greetings, Errata 7084 has been deleted because the text reported in not in the RFC/Section listed. Please submit a new errata with the correct RFC/Section. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Aug 14, 2022, at 8:00 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6823, > "Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7084 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Keep <keepplaying37@gmail.com> > > Section: Global > > Original Text > ------------- > Rosen, E., "Exterior Gateway Protocol," IEN-209, Bolt >> Beranek and Newman Inc., August 1982. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Rosen, E., "Exterior Gateway Protocol," IEN-209, Bolt >> Beranek and Newman Inc., August 1982, not issued > > Notes > ----- >> RFC823 references IEN-209, which was not issued, and won't be (https://www.rfc-editor.org/ien/scanned/ien209.pdf). I encourage discussion of whether it should reference RFC827 instead. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6823 (draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS >> Publication Date : December 2012 >> Author(s) : L. Ginsberg, S. Previdi, M. Shand >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : IS-IS for IP Internets >> Area : Routing >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6823 (draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS > Publication Date : December 2012 > Author(s) : L. Ginsberg, S. Previdi, M. Shand > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IS-IS for IP Internets > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6823 (7084) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Lsr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6823 (70… Chris Smiley