IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Methods to label the passive interfaces within ISIS

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 13 January 2020 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DB312011F for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:04:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fPtQtv7h; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=wAm5sjYT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pVGsHZVgvPiF for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D961D120120 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:03:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8141; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1578931426; x=1580141026; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=/gkBle8wMqp0wfTWHBRiupTQxRnz1UgtRU4UtU0b1XA=; b=fPtQtv7hII79HXz1gM2AWbxkfQx8HJ8Ugu6Ixgqtefk2oNgALz0WO2o0 YlvPdT7AFLjOEwv1dPU7dk+ANw5xYbe2tfk8Di5qedz1umozILqJLlTeF s6PyMgsU4ZQVEV1y6N8RkYOAj2neQCXk8BQW1moVJv0XtRjDSN8ZhCsFW w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:eycF3BYr2pIGLGl9IJaS353/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20QKbRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNHwQAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuJfXnYgQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ApAACAlBxe/5ldJa1mGgEBAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYFqAgEBAQELAYEkL1AFbFggBAsqhAyDRgOLBIJfkyuEYoJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAheBYSQ3Bg4CAw0BAQQBAQECAQUEbYU3DIVeAQEBAQMSER0BATcBDwIBCBEDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQBDQUigwQBgX1NAy4BAp8LAoE4iGF1gTKCfgEBBYUXGIIMCYE2AYwYGoIAgRABJyCCHi4+hGkGgmoygiyQTYVXmRwKgjeWLRuabI5bmnYCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWgjgVhwFWUBgkFQGA2IAYNzg0aHDXSBKIt2AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,429,1571702400"; d="scan'208,217";a="612887699"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Jan 2020 16:03:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 00DG3H3Y008590 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:03:17 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:03:16 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:03:16 -0600
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:03:15 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=B8kIh3HLbTKM7/h8i9ifFhyGyoGPND+XGJrBqOZVgQKyw0F1BkhnUkZQx67V6wM7+RJcyQrViHMQF2mT9Xjgcr9qGwbvnogJaB4NtOEXES+QJxA7mGNJIYVEKniuBEE9ynjRCP7Vk5rK65NSDuOidbFa6T0ubkDFQ9Tugm/O2aWqFy0ifCQOmaRv9/NlPkngvUUPPQ0VbkqmUvPgdJa7VEB/sebGgURnzrTaj8WNyWzeYcNWsAhys9UEtswkKOFX5sanTUJeaquIdGAYXZ5wXwY3iUVXtOwkZz4v25BlKNJvGmFI/D1jg/95nxlfIwidWxoc/61bci3fE0RE0XiZ0g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/gkBle8wMqp0wfTWHBRiupTQxRnz1UgtRU4UtU0b1XA=; b=LWQlJCw4IvemjRNhS+jpF/Gse80r7B2XT+UKvI57zO6m5H6e7l8d9vPttYvugM5CmQZAhz6vyYEu0sCiPj8zpQ6Lwq2WmrgKAWDsYkhtiQ5GVGr8CajHEMYeV35e2+hK2wLGuVYzRmnX42DJrgm6iwAD/cYKocGeQZV1eBW/eucxp3acNsGlwwnTalV1rjRDgMIbEZ6OQeWJdpYp0VFWRi4ItB+9yYFaOxqA+kl8D3DAyhKP4F7lt/NQU4QzpbRnNiy3QY9HAJcIVo8zrP3w2apXmTbu96UwJnkjxFeExLja+a08MboD6FHrBER99shq5xL77ebV73O2eMUVxHHRIA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/gkBle8wMqp0wfTWHBRiupTQxRnz1UgtRU4UtU0b1XA=; b=wAm5sjYTQcsM43yQILHrBvDCTnsfBmHvI+/QHBxn7b/9qockBdeUwSSxTEp4QMnI9JYSBbFQxNgmLFsNaxovRA4uQ62hlHGEVLnTpy5YUsdCCwCrNxcRocd+Pc3qFvWDZMro7rQKaVFGkIzhWHVw1s1PgbqEl3PX/vMHGHnN4E8=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3792.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.253.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2623.11; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:03:14 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f065:2931:17b6:7b5d]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f065:2931:17b6:7b5d%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2623.015; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:03:14 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "tony.li@tony.li" <tony.li@tony.li>, Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
CC: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Methods to label the passive interfaces within ISIS
Thread-Index: AQHVyiqaLeUdoclZFUu8xd5gLaWX6KfobcOA
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:03:14 +0000
Message-ID: <442C5535-E3C6-493F-A2F2-A9E9A4749C33@cisco.com>
References: <CAOj+MMHAbGo+0qd+xwTmymx4MYXGWmHe0p+d2ychQLQWUZ78wA@mail.gmail.com> <FC0F3982-2182-4CFB-8D60-A702C72BB87F@tsinghua.org.cn> <006901d5c75c$c24ad360$46e07a20$@org.cn> <BCA056AC-76B2-45B6-9FD0-61A5EBFC740C@tony.li> <00bb01d5c785$483d91b0$d8b8b510$@org.cn> <32D6BF50-90F8-40C1-81B3-4DA6646F3F6E@tony.li> <00eb01d5c9ec$ea8112d0$bf833870$@org.cn> <6951B8C6-905C-4AC8-B46E-8A708A6AEFE0@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <6951B8C6-905C-4AC8-B46E-8A708A6AEFE0@tony.li>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1002::a3]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: aa548b07-3a14-49f0-2509-08d7984218cf
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3792:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3792C9E194B5ECD911D8E515C2350@MN2PR11MB3792.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 028166BF91
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(110136005)(186003)(86362001)(53546011)(6506007)(71200400001)(6486002)(6512007)(36756003)(2906002)(316002)(54906003)(33656002)(9326002)(8676002)(81156014)(66946007)(81166006)(66446008)(5660300002)(2616005)(8936002)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(76116006)(4326008)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3792; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: cnQ0XOskj0Y5OQJJcFsmzT9Dh9kmKYmxwMr13y4AbmW2IzvHSjGv7YnRVI+ow37Zr+tR29oYmseD6DcxcOmr8r1EImjkLX/5EVnxk/7TfH937HlbgCJi9HlqmhRth8L3HDkxzZA4AucQIHwO3nDy0191be00GBTRd/1VdFzpjZm3bvvX0uEP/m9ujeBtaAyDzqlFoYkIWRmjx4ycXlRVthotb5E39VFOUb7wCrhMS6oAUobG0kP+S7HdxXiWeX3nr3i4RpHYHbt/LZb3G+Jnw3AL9aPwF6aXPRFpnTMFyCKBVhocZ8GvxV7s49Nn4cXzrboL+3ejw816wl7Uu36t9YBJzaMZe7lPAJnhXPiPBpbmiePBGFO0eu6WjsJ7HJ4tVWyR8JTPW8YVckHUVNjptYqVEUVqzwEYChQ5JJvobtXy5FihZyn9d3C//v4K75Nz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_442C5535E3C6493FA2F2A9E9A4749C33ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: aa548b07-3a14-49f0-2509-08d7984218cf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Jan 2020 16:03:14.5397 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: sOSrff+KwY9RjFrKQCquQ5qO6CNWQdPssbtyLMgFOB3wu0MtTkRUhON/yN1NXOxu
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3792
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.16, xch-aln-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/YpL_5tOEXKQzfYjTLY2qZCpD8t4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Methods to label the passive interfaces within ISIS
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:04:04 -0000

Hi Aijun,
I guess the external use case for this is advertisement in BGP-LS for Network Management purposes?? There really isn’t IS-IS requirement to know whether or not an interface is a passive interface.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Monday, January 13, 2020 at 11:00 AM
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Methods to label the passive interfaces within ISIS


Hi Anjun,



Is it reasonable to put the link attribute information into the “IP Reachability TLV”?
IMHO, such stub link is not the normal links within IGP domain.  Label the related prefix is coming from the passive/stub link seems also acceptable?


Well, a passive interface is really configured so that you advertise the interface’s prefix.  Attaching the data that you want to the associated data seems reasonable to me.

There’s no good IS Neighbor advertisement to attach the sub-TLV to because there is no neighbor.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email