Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAD71311A5; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:50:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYGeCITR5QuH; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:50:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DD0131100; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:50:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7672; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1545180601; x=1546390201; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=E4db8zk1ycse/5d+BdX8boaQCK3hAZmA/2bpAOJV/xI=; b=PmHNhfKXAPHld8nwH1o1CoPfDNP0MAOqhnt4GbIME3JVBeN7Yh3uA4YH 6lCYHbzx5R0qA+M9UH/RIpX3mFaUlCemHDO/NV0jjyVwBk9/SzjiPllHp moIie1uGOUTvMW5LuWSKu+7lNwuc8mRAWaV04h/NfRvtknrflNb5S6zEM c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAAAtlRlc/5JdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDXZmgQInCoNziBmLfIFoJZF/hVuBewsBAYRsGYJEIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbSiFPAEGHQZoAQgRAwECJAcCBDAdCgQBEoMiAYEcZKZ2gS+KMIw/F4F/gRAoDBOCTIUhBoJiMYImAo86kWoJApFeGIFdhR+KW4MJhjuQCAIRFIEnHziBVnAVOyoBgkGCUI4LQTGNSIEfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,370,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="215386899"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2018 00:50:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBJ0nxof010287 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:50:00 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:49:59 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:49:59 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext@ietf.org" <draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
Thread-Index: AQHUlzTE45sjUFTDpEKBuZhGCITfAg==
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:49:59 +0000
Message-ID: <D12F42B8-8F0D-4462-A628-9FB4A6CDECB5@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D12F42B88F0D4462A6289FB4A6CDECB5ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.152, xch-rtp-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ZlY-sJGJcNFKV0BofZCgYp2yGtA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:50:04 -0000

The WG adoption call has completely with a good amount of support and no objections.
Please republish the draft as: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-spine-leaf-ext-00.txt

Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 7:54 PM
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

This begins a two-week WG adoption call for the subject draft. As anyone who has been following the topic knows, there are a lot of proposal in this space. However, as WG co-chair, I believe this simple IS-IS extension doesn’t really conflict with any of the other more disruptive flooding proposals. Also, it is more mature and there is some implementation momentum. Note that I’m making every attempt to be transparent and it is perfectly ok to disagree with me. Please post your comments to this list before 12:00 AM, December 16th, 2018.

With respect to the more disruptive proposals, we are discussing our next steps.

Thanks,
Acee