[Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 17 May 2020 04:36 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364943A0D42; Sat, 16 May 2020 21:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, acee@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.130.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <158969018219.30789.6119849985741094254@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 21:36:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/_JP7t3nmJKY0GsNJtmX7tUapOHc>
Subject: [Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 04:36:22 -0000
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [[ nits ]] [ section 1 ] * "(e.g., SR-MPLS" is missing a closing parenthesis [ section 3 ] * "...unless all of its interfaces...":" do management interfaces, or other interfaces over which no forwarding is taking place, count in this definition of "all"? If not, does this text need to be tightened or is this just one of those things all implementers will naturally figure out? (I'm actually betting this is just something readers will intuit.)
- [Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-osp… Erik Kline via Datatracker
- Re: [Lsr] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf… Peter Psenak