[Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-04: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 29 November 2021 11:52 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3163A078D; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 03:52:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, acee@cisco.com, jgs@juniper.net, acee@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.40.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <163818672901.1395.11084002418072692702@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 03:52:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/bBqcpTeQzuMqYJD4S9b_bqwJnRo>
Subject: [Lsr] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:52:10 -0000

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Vijay Gurbani for their General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/vTI3euK_FgI2nI-8482WikVehC8).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

Section 2.2. , paragraph 11, nit:
> eudo-node LSP for this interface. Otherwise it will only increment the metric
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^
A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb "Otherwise".

Section 2.2. , paragraph 15, nit:
> ic announcements from neighbors. By default reverse metric handling is disab
>                                  ^^^^^^^^^^
Did you mean: "By default,"?

These URLs point to tools.ietf.org, which is being deprecated:
 * https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX
 * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-42
 * https://tools.ietf.org/wg/lsr/