IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed & IETF 111

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Mon, 12 July 2021 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9B63A21F8; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G0ABLHTUaIf4; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4460C3A21F6; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 09:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (047-026-251-217.res.spectrum.com [47.26.251.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83D8E803FB; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Message-Id: <0E56493E-05B2-4557-85E7-14E7E4D40A07@chopps.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B713470B-5189-4F3C-A617-FFDFDA939017"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 12:52:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337E478527E958DFC0850F5C1189@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
References: <14511_1625821253_60E81045_14511_281_5_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A4CE14487@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BY5PR11MB4337E478527E958DFC0850F5C1189@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/iMPSz7LgMOWDf0YnhSYynueCzGE>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-decraene-lsr-isis-flooding-speed & IETF 111
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:52:42 -0000


> On Jul 9, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree with Bruno that the time available in the WG meeting will likely be inadequate to present full updates for both drafts. In addition, I think it is important that the WG have
> an opportunity to discuss publicly in an interactive way, the merits of each proposal. The likelihood that time will be available in the scheduled WG meeting for that discussion as well seems low.

How about we use the time in the IETF WG meeting to give a high level summary of what would be presented in more depth at the interim, and then we can have discussion to decide what else might should go in the interim. Perhaps others will feel inspired to also present during the interim after hearing the high level summary! :) It shouldn’t be hard to schedule a follow on interim shortly after IETF wraps even if we wait.

Thanks,
Chris (co-chair hat)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email