[Lsr] [Errata Verified] RFC4576 (7765)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 January 2024 18:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9536CC151087; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:18:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9G7i5_x90Bjp; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F367C151084; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 0FA581A49953; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:18:41 -0800 (PST)
To: julesreid@gmail.com, erosen@cisco.com, ppsenak@cisco.com, ppe@cisco.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jgs@juniper.net, iesg@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240116181841.0FA581A49953@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:18:41 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/l_Lbb2IfjCP4VKcdtdGbk4EPg1Y>
Subject: [Lsr] [Errata Verified] RFC4576 (7765)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:18:41 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC4576, "Using a Link State Advertisement (LSA) Options Bit to Prevent Looping in BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7765 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Julian Cowley <julesreid@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2024-01-15 Verified by: John Scudder (IESG) Section: 7 Original Text ------------- [OSPFv2] Postel, J., "Suggested Telnet Protocol Changes", RFC 328, April 1972. Corrected Text -------------- [OSPFv2] Moy, J., "OSPF Version 2", RFC 2328, April 1998. Notes ----- The error was caused by a missing 2 in front of the RFC number in the reference. -------------------------------------- RFC4576 (draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Using a Link State Advertisement (LSA) Options Bit to Prevent Looping in BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) Publication Date : June 2006 Author(s) : E. Rosen, P. Psenak, P. Pillay-Esnault Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Lsr] [Errata Verified] RFC4576 (7765) RFC Errata System