Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-05.txt

Yingzhen Qu <> Wed, 25 July 2018 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0481130F79; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wCctfX6e0-MR; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3C0130FA2; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 36CD079D0C59C; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 05:10:54 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 05:10:55 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:10:51 -0700
From: Yingzhen Qu <>
To: "" <>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-05.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUHoshlhUniy0UPEe3ODqwDjvqnqSf0xWA
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 04:10:51 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-05.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 04:11:03 -0000

Hi authors,

I just run idnits against version 05, and there is still a warning:

  Miscellaneous warnings:

  == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if
     it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a paragraph with
     a matching beginning. Boilerplate error?

     RFC 8174, paragraph 11:
        The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
        described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they
        appear in all capitals, as shown here.     

     ... text found in draft:
        The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
        and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
        described in BCP14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they
        appear in all capitals, as shown here.

This is really minor. I suppose you can fix it later with other comments if there is any.


On 7/18/18, 4:33 AM, "Lsr on behalf of" < on behalf of> wrote:

    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
    This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
            Title           : OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement
            Authors         : Peter Psenak
                              Ketan Jivan Talaulikar
                              Wim Henderickx
                              Padma Pillay-Esnault
    	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-05.txt
    	Pages           : 7
    	Date            : 2018-07-18
       Every OSPF interface is assigned an identifier, Interface ID, which
       uniquely identifies the interface on the router.  In some cases it is
       useful to know the Interface ID assigned by the adjacent router on
       its side of the adjacency (Remote Interface ID).
       This draft describes the extensions to OSPF link-local signalling to
       advertise the Local Interface Identifier.
    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    There are also htmlized versions available at:
    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    until the htmlized version and diff are available at
    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    Lsr mailing list