[Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 18 May 2021 16:05 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4893A1868; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, chopps@chopps.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162135395603.17789.1529550001792151463@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:05:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/oCNTMx0uhMyOerrGYHITq4bYj68>
Subject: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:05:56 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated), and some nits. Thank you to Christian Hopps for his shepherd's write-up (including the WG consensus). I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 2 -- Any reason why the bits of the 'Flags' field are not reserved (except for the O-bit) ? or be in a to-be-created IANA registry? I would expect the default value for sending them (usually 0) and what to do on the receiving side(s) when the value is not 0 (usually ignore them). E.g., see the section 7.1 -- Section 3 -- Isn't it obvious that the "Segment Routing Algorithm" is also supported by SRv6 routers ? Consider removing this section ? If you prefer to keep it, then please use the wording "Segment Routing Algorithm" exactly as in the IANA registry. -- Section 7.1 (also 7.2 and possibly others) -- The header 'Length' should not be defined as 'variable' as it is probably a fixed length of 1 octet. Specifying how it is measured and in which units (octets, 32-bit word, ...) is probably welcome. -- Section 7.2 -- What is the default value of the "Flags" field? == NITS == -- title- Should the plural form be used for 'extension' ? -- Section 1 -- s\topology/algorithm specific\topology/algorithm-specific\ ? -- Section 13 -- While there is a rather long contributors list, there is no acknowledgement section. The latter is of course optional but usual. Should the doc shepherd or last call reviewers be acknowledged ?
- [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ls… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-iet… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)