[Lsr] 答复: Re: LSR agenda uploaded

[Aijun Wang <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Yingzhen:

 

The discussions on the list express only there are unsolved issues for the current MP-TLV solution, there is no start the discussion of updated draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-isis-big-tlv/.

I wonder how you can make the conclusion for “there is no support of draft-wang-lsr-isis-big-tlv”.

 

Very curious that how LSR WG to put forward such error prone solution to be published, 

Before your such action, I would expect that the LSR Chairs can address the technical issues officially raised at 

1)     [Lsr] Re: [Further Discussion]It's time to find one general solution to Big-TLV problem Re: IETF 121 LSR Slot Requests <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/zwcrVLz8AlEbzb4HdTe-ezGBHdU/> 

2)     [Lsr] Re: Conclusion of WGLC for draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/R_kRmdppR5k9LQ3QpcLpcA_s2gA/> 

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

发件人: Yingzhen Qu [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2024年10月30日 0:49
收件人: Aijun Wang <[e-mail]>
抄送: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>; lsr <[e-mail]>; lsr-chairs <[e-mail]>
主题: Re: [Lsr] Re: LSR agenda uploaded

 

Hi Aijun,

 

>From the discussion on the list, it's clear that there is no support of draft-wang-lsr-isis-big-tlv, and we're not going to add it to the agenda.

 

Thanks,

Yingzhen

 

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 4:04 AM Aijun Wang <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:

Hi, Acee:

If there are other proposals that can solve the complex problems of IS-IS big TLV, we will abandon our updated draft.

But, based on the on going discussions on the LSR list, MP-TLV proposal has more issues emerged.

Will you keep such problems unsolved, or the proposal not deployable?

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Oct 29, 2024, at 18:40, Acee Lindem <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:
> 
> Aijun,
> 
> Seriously? We just concluded the LSR list discussion of draft-wang-lsr-isis-big-tlv which is a more complex version of the previously rejected draft-chen-lsr-isis-big-tlv.
> 
> We don't want to spend any more WG time on IS-IS Big TLV drafts.
> 
> Acee
> 
> 
>> On Oct 29, 2024, at 5:14 AM, Aijun Wang <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, Yingzhen:
>> We would like to add one more request for the coming IETF 121 meeting.
>> The presentation information are the followings:
>> Draft Name:  IS-IS Extension for Big TLV
>> Link:    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-isis-big-tlv/
>> Presenter: Aijun Wang
>> Desired Slot Length: 10-15minutes.
>> I will try to summarize the ongoing discussions of MP-TLV and the necessary of new proposal for Big-TLV.
>> Face to Face discussions are also welcome.
>> Best Regards
>> Aijun Wang
>> China Telecom
>> 发件人: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>  [mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> ] 代表 Yingzhen Qu
>> 发送时间: 2024年10月24日 22:19
>> 收件人: lsr <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; lsr-chairs <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
>> 主题: [Lsr] LSR agenda uploaded
>> Hi all,
>> The draft LSR agenda for IETF 121 has been uploaded: IETF-121 : lsr
>> Please let us know if there are missed requests or changes needed.
>> Thanks,
>> Yingzhen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list -- [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>