[Lsr] [Errata Verified] RFC8668 (6957)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 10 May 2022 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FB4C15E6E5; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQH-HRPTqdiL; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C40C159494; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id ADFE81EBA8; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: pravkum4@cisco.com, ginsberg@cisco.com, abashandy.ietf@gmail.com, cf@cisco.com, mohan.nanduri@oracle.com, exa@arrcus.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jgs@juniper.net, iesg@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220510160259.ADFE81EBA8@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:02:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/s7rwt8wqPLjQX2s1FiEpl1R3jb0>
Subject: [Lsr] [Errata Verified] RFC8668 (6957)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 16:03:04 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8668,
"Advertising Layer 2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6957

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Praveen Kumar <pravkum4@cisco.com>
Date Reported: 2022-05-09
Verified by: John Scudder (IESG)

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
The name of the IANA registry for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222,
and 223 has been changed to include sub-TLV 25.

Corrected Text
--------------
The name of the IANA registry for Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 141, 222,
and 223 has been changed to include TLV 25.

Notes
-----
25 is top-level TLV. By mistake, it is written as sub-TLV.

(See also https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/LvcOMxMuJW40ThHJeV3nOjl-0HY/)

--------------------------------------
RFC8668 (draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Advertising Layer 2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS
Publication Date    : December 2019
Author(s)           : L. Ginsberg, Ed., A. Bashandy, C. Filsfils, M. Nanduri, E. Aries
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG