Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Fast Flooding" - draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00

[[e-mail]]

As co-author, I support adopting this draft as a WG document.

I'd favor the standard track:

  *   I'd argue that _flow_ control based on a signaled window is simple (compared to congestion control), old and well-known and not subject to experimentation any more. It has been deployed in much more diverse environment and larger scale, e.g. TCP and QUIC.
  *   Even if the _congestion_ control algorithm is not agreed upon, there is chance that explicitly signaling supported flooding parameters/capabilities yields to better behavior compared to guessing, and simpler deployment considerations compared to requiring configuration of those parameters. Eventually in the future, the WG would agree on a sub-set of standard track parameters (sub-TLV) carried in the TLV defined in this document. Having this document experimental would lead to a downref.

Thanks,
--Bruno




Orange Restricted
From: Lsr <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 3:07 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Fast Flooding" - draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00

We indicated the intent to adopt of draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-00 as an LSR WG document at the IETF 112 LSR WG meeting.
We are now confirming WG consensus on this action. Please indicate your support or objection on this list by 12:00 AM UTC on December 7th, 2021.

Another question that came to light is whether the document should be standards track or experimental. If you have an opinion on this matter, please chime in along with your arguments for one track or the other. We probably won't make a final decision on this now but let's get the discussion started.

Here is a link for your convenience:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraeneginsberg-lsr-isis-fast-flooding/

Thanks,
Acee

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.