Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption Call for draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability-01 (June 22 to July 6)

Jacob Uecker <juecker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 26 June 2018 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <juecker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C393130E2F; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id icyZHQs-PTz9; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x241.google.com (mail-pf0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C6E130E2B; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id z24-v6so8568992pfe.7; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kBa06PudhCaDfYkLSxbamnwm9F1j0GrdMabM9qfnCfs=; b=GDbebSnY9BaRyI3aQQh83EGvIyy56XTz/FK4OFj6DwT5LbTBWExEnLkzghsbOA4YSW psSIeXuSUTjbxw+gYB45oyxI0rL94KiFO8IieY3+u/+6o9864a6A2GcLHde3ycMXn7SG 9UxE6WAPmPod7ChvuJz1s+2Iut+pECk0paxlyMRH9KrxsgqlrmDNL5GLXnRLiRmlPrbs n4Ic6VoxqQ46rtIS1OWz+yt1lgWGB/Q1EaqFi7XF97ubHdJPBBsShq5uEgB8ZYw1mAIG 6dSI1P3Ltpq1KUjcetW1ZSSNoAW9bsn12t33/aSHnigtJZdESe+HzcD4jpD648IlJF86 OtlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kBa06PudhCaDfYkLSxbamnwm9F1j0GrdMabM9qfnCfs=; b=lPQ16W1oWPlumRvIN24OyYMH8OyFdCSE6UyvftOmzmagz3T5Zm4A+5bZMxmR80XZEw nFIovucci5eqPu5d0W4K2zW9JZjnVOS29ahmAvlQ+5ZM20tkvdRL0Adu1x2Hh76q8Xfs 4jt7xbQilcijTf4U8H2+fvtgkCTyOeU4C0r2SZBAF69PNsdg/YIT8I620M714nU6nPl/ ajGyMTW6oU88SV7SxkqZb3x/BK9j/5kkZHMgUCJEzYiOyJQ5say8wnwLcejxRYO2Y/bY AJT5eExiTZTaIiinCAQRingN2CCW1ViPyqZS8ZtQ/uLIn228wtQeReaXfOZdNwa0qEcv JCXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0qnKm3/fTYI9GFvlbfxaZp4X4u8FekoPACPE683bdw/QZ5QmC5 EXMtYKyQzivENY0gdwppKg0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJTZ7n8spjUDzi96zVjKiNAfuVY7EHQ+r2Y1VphwByQ7zR6UWUb4DGLRtUrT+ahayJiuI4m0g==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:714c:: with SMTP id b12-v6mr2561301pgn.420.1530043441236; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8801:880:d03:74e5:9bd7:67c2:3ac0? ([2600:8801:880:d03:74e5:9bd7:67c2:3ac0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9-v6sm4915620pfg.183.2018.06.26.13.03.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jacob Uecker <juecker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB1740189298429C9DA4A25CABE0750@HE1PR0701MB1740.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:03:57 -0700
Cc: "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, "draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability@ietf.org" <draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability@ietf.org>, Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B3F460DB-1047-4E78-AE8C-2647B807965D@gmail.com>
References: <HE1PR0701MB1740189298429C9DA4A25CABE0750@HE1PR0701MB1740.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/NUaU7Biq-W1I2ng9rMO2vRDRGLY>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WG Adoption Call for draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability-01 (June 22 to July 6)
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 20:04:05 -0000

1) I support the doc as LSVR WG Doc
2) Yes
3) Nothing to stop the adoption as WG Doc
4 and 5) None at this point
 

> On Jun 22, 2018, at 1:44 AM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability/ " from June 22 to July 6 .
> During your discussion in the WG Adoption Call, the chairs are looking for more context as only a 'yeh' or 'ney'.
>  
> please indicate the following things:
>  
> 1)           Support to adopt draft "draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability-01" as LSVR WG document?
> 2)            Do you feel " draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability-01" complies to the LSVR charter, please explain if you think it does not conform to the LSVR charter?
> 3)            Are there any technical issues with this draft?
> 4)           Which are current pain-points in the draft requiring additional content and technical attention?
> 5)            What is missing from this draft?
>  
> For your quick access to this draft, find the link below:
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability/
>  
>  
> Kind Regards,
>  
> Victor & Gunter
> co-chairs LSVR WG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsvr mailing list
> Lsvr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr