Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 (to end January 21, 2020)
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 24 March 2020 21:32 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C0C3A12D5 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=lLVtnt1V; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Bfcp30ag
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGdEq3Z3Rd9Q for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160913A12B9 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=24961; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1585085555; x=1586295155; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=i5sS1KZ8BBe+hnW4RTjuN0yhJ1BtwI1Q6ageeraSOvU=; b=lLVtnt1VAhCktwlcutg5hbiIOJNrvZJKv3nVCIToiPLQqVIjw1H4AQ31 ninUeo46BNikNnWZ8a52qw2Tn59dgrIq04v6C8rJ15w8W1KCY1dLRIENh dbJcxx7mb1u3/LN+1Z8fsTroYRfvZMKhjTr76vDmEaIUZzDuDz2O+0oRt U=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:TI7UUhSGWFlIrYyTdbopzOXJF9psv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESUANfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8KavjZCE3NM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BgAQDle3pe/5JdJa1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgXuBJS9QBWxYIAQLKgqEDoNFA4pzToIRmB6CUgNUCgEBAQwBARgBCgoCBAEBhEQCF4IQJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVjAQEBAQMBARALBh0BASwMDwIBBgIRAwEBASgDAgICJQsUCQgBAQQBEiKDBAGBfk0DLgEOkhmQZwKBOYhidYEygn8BAQWBQ0GDKxiCDAMGgTiMLxqCAIERJyCCTT6BBIFgAQECAQGBeAkNCYJbMoIskHeFeIojj0YKgjyHX48pHYJMiCyEVowQjxGJD5JkAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBU7KgGCQVAYDY4dGINbhRSFQXQCgSeMXgGBDwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,301,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="467381564"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 Mar 2020 21:32:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02OLWYE7030820 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:32:34 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:32:33 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:32:33 -0400
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:32:32 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=nWO8X6ba7Y9I1K2ZE5qWixxitaxR58eLZvGUgsZ+TzIQAlbptRx90h12ADoNp2qcYt2KFAZs2sb90yZsUEGzIcYw9oc9kllXKpYLkd+eC/r3hdJ7mFgXZINTvH4LVTmw9AX+IL9ghqBxaqMrP7IZjzn6NeuYqtxweB3LDn8gQ8t0WASQ9VktTxd2kaEpZSlaVhkp64gBnBAP0DLjeM8xcuAc6ZvjqsuguTlB/WUfmUaRRc2e4LwyuSPcUEDO6yQa9fhGlLQjCgS4eOjQA3jYSP3Y08nLxpnQpYktDMTPLbxfbPkx5LukO6FEgZvqPfo9pR13EHqiu2ByU7dx5meWmw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=i5sS1KZ8BBe+hnW4RTjuN0yhJ1BtwI1Q6ageeraSOvU=; b=LAFFBN2w4tBL3+KgROK8+Nj9xBBqMAwUnlCegp0cFACTK8XBvhYJrZ6UcoVTc2b7sXmEtg0pUNI3CxXwL3xMV25dX4PDbRXocVBUbiyeKdC6fE3CtO+thNT5rRk17b6kn7vUP3wh6AafMgP6bZrm1OItcwTrKWtz7lwmouMvZhEk+FkvVwP5MR0juVXHyCj8lGRtNBBkNX1Wy60CL10m0W6yld3jheKTGhuJ2ixPwsiaISky5yUJqKeYwXTWw26cpHmAsB6Sr4bEZB9WEwsOB4solfQ0BsCb1sTvZE3ZNUDNuEKoIkvtsDnWHc7gKlA00ZzdiwwwX3DyEqEocU73nw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=i5sS1KZ8BBe+hnW4RTjuN0yhJ1BtwI1Q6ageeraSOvU=; b=Bfcp30age33OJvVyIJ8OGE7WNYZtje/MiJfm7cdBYT2/vnXnQmR9Uby0yrdkww3K0kZMH+LH2fqaXk4YAE4/F7gJv8f6MX0oNKfgfcqqyHGpzsRkJ4+RdfCMv6XZCe0ske6T8wWQbqUXqDgIcytM1q+umlVfQTgeZttvUDZoafw=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:8f::13) by BN8PR11MB3665.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:91::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2835.18; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:32:31 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55b2:c415:675f:5fb7]) by BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55b2:c415:675f:5fb7%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2835.021; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:32:31 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 (to end January 21, 2020)
Thread-Index: AdXFPESJQqXWSN51Tqy1DO85V6W27gG/Ap5wAQ4F/gAACLzQgAxbtbSA
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:32:31 +0000
Message-ID: <93CD7CD4-C50B-40F2-B9BB-7C8D018254DC@cisco.com>
References: <AM6PR07MB482349E2CC33B30A35F7D0A9E03F0@AM6PR07MB4823.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM6PR07MB482383564D43B71545F8F411E0360@AM6PR07MB4823.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <513025242.9878512.1579620926598@mail.yahoo.com> <077EC01A-0CE6-411D-98D2-B7689D11B071@arrcus.com>
In-Reply-To: <077EC01A-0CE6-411D-98D2-B7689D11B071@arrcus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6fc0e3d5-6310-4c3a-02c7-08d7d03adbfb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3665:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB36658ABCA0D0E935BA63244BC2F10@BN8PR11MB3665.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 03524FBD26
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(6506007)(66476007)(66946007)(76116006)(91956017)(66556008)(33656002)(26005)(36756003)(53546011)(86362001)(66446008)(64756008)(5660300002)(110136005)(81166006)(966005)(6512007)(9326002)(8936002)(81156014)(478600001)(8676002)(71200400001)(2906002)(2616005)(186003)(6486002)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR11MB3665; H:BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 6bJV7vMDjBiDaeZ+wrLsZkenDvvYhrWkxCjMWJoZvnFDk3yavy7J6yqz6cBv466gVe/l70jbgi4tD/UrzjnkR/An3tcb9fbVzUJk+sNqn+3GXVGd9fa58JLgPEyeSQdTL/Erthy1gfKvCA9WFdAYmg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_93CD7CD4C50B40F2B9BB7C8D018254DCciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6fc0e3d5-6310-4c3a-02c7-08d7d03adbfb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Mar 2020 21:32:31.1546 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: vGhbsnJwOU34XVn8mIYEJ1mQCfyPYL0NWWRL60J9VKaODB5jCmq29snOsj8Zi8J5
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3665
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/SiLy4TKkmNpf9l7lHMSNOiTJNwA>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 (to end January 21, 2020)
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:33:02 -0000
Hi Boris, Please take a look at the -05 version. I’ve incorporated your comments. Thanks, Acee From: Lsvr <lsvr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com> Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 10:45 PM To: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, Gunter Van de Velde <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 (to end January 21, 2020) Hi Boris, Thanks for your comments and detail review. 😊 Ack on all three. We will cover it in next revision. Regards, Keyur From: Lsvr <lsvr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 7:35 AM To: "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 (to end January 21, 2020) Hi Gunter and all, Sorry for the late reply. I read the draft and personally support its publication. Few comments for the next updated version: 1) The References part needs to be updated since there are newer versions of those drafts are available. 2) Can RFC 5549 approach be incorporated for simplification of BGP connected graph configuration and creation? There is example of such implementation for kind of BGP unnumbered peering configuration so it could be useful here too, IMO. 3) I think that LSVR/BGP-LS SPF has another very important use case: using of of real topology information of CLOS network for monitoring and troubleshooting instead of using home-made tools for topology verification... Can we extend the draft for such case in the the next version? Thanks. SY, Boris On Thursday, January 16, 2020, 9:45:40 AM GMT+3, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> wrote: Tuesday 21 January is approaching soon. If you read the draft, please post your comments on document readiness and completeness. Be well, G/ From: Lsvr <lsvr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 16:39 To: lsvr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 (to end January 21, 2020) Hi All, The LSVR WG initiates a working group last call for "draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04". Please send your comments to the list before Tuesday January 21. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability/ All, please reply on-list indicating if you're aware of an implementation. If not already completed, please reply on-list indicating if you're aware of any relevant IPR. Brgds, Gunter & Victor LSVR WG co-chairs _______________________________________________ Lsvr mailing list Lsvr@ietf.org<mailto:Lsvr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr
- [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-04 … Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Keyur Patel
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Matt Anderson
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Keyur Patel
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Shawn Zandi
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Santosh P K
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Boris Hassanov
- Re: [Lsvr] WGLC for draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Acee Lindem (acee)