[Lsvr] LSVR IETF101 Meeting Follow-up
Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Mon, 26 March 2018 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9581126DC2 for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OyjGzbHE4WJk for <lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22c.google.com (mail-ot0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB64126DCA for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i28-v6so18811950otf.8 for <lsvr@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s4bw4OxprVyoZ5Ulab27v7s7PaKKuILTQ6fOswVIHP4=; b=P3gV8xf+fTouq4BQcIDns+sGXBvSfHcgrV4LrU7GJ3Y0SaEzbkhPkKZQdOyUHF8Pm3 3lXIccSJyzwe2PAFYIE8yqjwcLN8C0XvN/BTvEp8b2J1YqRMxBQDDWKzV2MgR5zZV/TF r4egMX4AYbp6IHZyw3Ioc63BWXPhqZVNou3rXR25OPVKQJdAB9aQhY7yf+rn2XgY7rCc hf2h+GHHv87UmNmO+ekO6wj6CP+In60f4CUGtjTwWY6DqwGFwoySvtL+JpTFrPweeTwI 8Lk04r5hVnIMja437SGeKnrR1DXRL3KCvhJmGAtcnY7U2Iycu4Q3wG/wYjtw/zL/FAKv JmtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s4bw4OxprVyoZ5Ulab27v7s7PaKKuILTQ6fOswVIHP4=; b=aoBlugu1cJmCz6rMKs3MDSk7Xc55YEFJo/Xn8ulx1P2wfIy47H4Cap3Ph6DDaOaXaU x07D79yKMNqOw3Ua8e6V6LjBFJ/KA18IPLyC3o8lwDW37SEzr5xpm1D28wJ0QLUvv8/m pS6oSmahYiMtGDSsS0aVmauFvgUFgqlJUl2nQEJmSPOuUvYQB7J+yZ75WoMdJnfKHm9o qRyuoTp4ZMET908WPyOUYQwzXYULytyajX+WI9nJsVGNDr3Ra5Y8kpxPfC4FxycAX07R DDuSpPAQHOiSW0kxx3ee5Z3EXmEk5n6iuraJux4ZObvtvOZdTST2Suj10FyihcqrNBwF 770g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GuDjuT1wbPZ/b4ODpxv1NwH3W8bUQQCms1xn8usmtxMjZho5ud v5vJfqPgPn4R6yWw/hbysEYuPfcNFkpdbLVdPO7lw274
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsemtQHEglbOGrc4WNmeUSbDR3huslWzhOMQZNq2JF1ZexTlVWFCQFBLqBI4sOCOEsfetNsGp6HxqqmdhMXHVE=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:153d:: with SMTP id u58-v6mr5088726otf.196.1522024189407; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:40ae:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:29:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaN3FMZVBmBJozrBN4myDCiZ77VGQ04_WbeLdxD4VGC5rA@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsvr@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/qzG3KVB2I5IWlA_ysZ-5oCwoM-I>
Subject: [Lsvr] LSVR IETF101 Meeting Follow-up
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:29:53 -0000
LSVR WG, During our meeting last week at IETF101, we had a few closing comments which we said we would repeat on the list to ensure all members were aware of upcoming needs and expectations. Please make note of the following: (1). For LSVR Applicability Document - https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-keyupate-lsvr-applicability-00.txt - New version of document expected by April 14th - The Chairs will be looking for reviews following the -01 document release - The group will look for adoption call following new version release and comment (2) For LSVR BGP SPF Specification Document - https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-keyupate-lsvr-bgp-spf-00.txt - We are looking for further document review from LSVR participants - Volunteers who are willing to conduct detailed review wanted - We will look for adoption call following next round of feedback Given the current milestones within our charter, we will be looking to progress this work at an expeditious pace. regards, Gunter and Victor Co-Chairs
- [Lsvr] LSVR IETF101 Meeting Follow-up Victor Kuarsingh