Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-07
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 10 December 2020 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsvr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937AD3A1251; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4RnI00bb4s8U; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECE93A1254; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id w1so4398226ejf.11; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ehsKHni6iyUGpRWO/krvv+iT+6zmxstwK0h1rORkkWo=; b=fpsrb0/gEC6+/1nN8G+Dr2Nklof8i9+gP63zYnDUcT8kX/Ocxwk2yeB+39tVMD95Dg 1SdBW1KavZyNrXadvIS1Vs34CkKicmTySxLvO1yWh5jExRIWYgm3kw7E4ZudaCJ8Z9M6 TSLhr76pApiMAOxHU/PCoCpeQQvzpkUJyVMyECX5f+07APJgGWOuyxl/CVqpABk9cs1B 0MME/srBzhFgz9y+NQXmXNzhNSMo5Vul9xx7v+b18tq6rgahqPp0TdqVmKz7ldGA4XC3 BeHSeRBP4ftmPWgN7yPsOrc8I203bKR91NGcyZpzCqRmcK+PGCHvjF/tTKYjmPGQhAU9 woLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ehsKHni6iyUGpRWO/krvv+iT+6zmxstwK0h1rORkkWo=; b=FAikS+NBh3rJIxBZT/xc5QjeUk0HcMUeQ925Hyz6/EPAJIBJMt6zJUyG35dqboxNR5 X5Ui2OUURXLUCm0z2DCU62xbk4msVT9d/G0qZjJxqPHJm6ckJOdWQ9zdMz+pkO0cDB4p zD5DPfV50i+ErxVGqBFNqCb7vQCplJKAClEeRL/0Rq4woiVuAU6HAOF8CcwYvdTwLhCy yTul9u6IFWCZSHMlLIgYdo8Mdgn64DeMNEKxzOxjsFsJWl0QPaZC6ZC6XjA1uNf1xlkw NtZLz8cE6PmDnBDPiM3GYzDgv4DK4LAXP//4OYvISPtuFG4oeBN2IXuiAe7cSNR6WzEJ +/3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UCCAtH46Zlo1aq+LvLECLvjiu6VHVlas+jdvJxEEdhctdD+fg GFP6Xy8vfyh+Sp9mVy7K6i/0MM3HSwSItR0tEec=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyf3ndwTOnl8BIBDG3+obEIY/g1DCfVBIGPfPoSJIvYYENAkIG3860gFuNUigRX/DHr3APJM4m8B1fkbG28yw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b101:: with SMTP id u1mr7951199ejy.457.1607629832476; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:32 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0CCBF818-C3C8-454C-8F87-07CD1F76FE1B@cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESszYHXL0qq3fgBU4wowE1C9g_UCKLS3nCFRcQg1LLOrMfA@mail.gmail.com> <0CCBF818-C3C8-454C-8F87-07CD1F76FE1B@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESswKEiMTrgGa3Vp8yYYETiufZe7vmZH4AY4TRdc_zWQ8uA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsvr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsvr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsvr@ietf.org" <lsvr@ietf.org>, "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000185ed505b6217dad"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsvr/uSHj18bidx55wFUSOslyIqK67ls>
Subject: Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability-07
X-BeenThere: lsvr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Vector Routing <lsvr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsvr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsvr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsvr>, <mailto:lsvr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 19:50:36 -0000
Acee: Hi! I purposefully try to no do that so I don’t interfere with the WG process. It is up to the WG (not the AD) to determine when a document is ready to be forwarded to the IESG. I don’t want my opinion to influence the WG’s decision, not only if I think it might be ready but the WG doesn’t, but more importantly the other way around. Having said that, if the Chairs want my opinion on a document they can ask. I can take a quick look, but an in-depth review will have to wait. Alvaro. On December 10, 2020 at 6:02:14 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) (acee@cisco.com) wrote: In the future, as the responsible LSVR AD, it would be helpful if you would review the drafts prior to request for publication.
- [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-applicability… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-applicabi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsvr] AD Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-applicabi… Alvaro Retana