IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Thu, 06 December 2007 17:38 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0KgX-0001JE-1R; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:38:53 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0KgW-0001J9-JQ for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:38:52 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0KgW-0001J1-8C for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:38:52 -0500
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0KgV-0007W4-OA for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:38:52 -0500
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k40so1020690wah for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=oaghXfTqIRlFoOIft3hog8WoUDjmjPzEBJmBW7D7Xa0=; b=Z7wfcRzUV1sxYQdyAswjc5tPVO8WZHKqkMaJb8A1ed2p0nMJ2vNB6ytbfbUNC/YX6bYeg1gY86vYS03pDFZM8t+Itl9OGtNlf22AL1r8W6R87h8j4fcPJV4owc23XHOm+hsagwe1rc4TRGLry1fyLqtaQIHYKjgIvMscd5g7EvA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=yDnnnOe5TNwCSmR50Q64jIHWeeR+kYRPdz48781WiUbTnZz0EFsXATDspBsRDkziEzLXWn1twpTn55rerIcKqMf/Gc+Vj4vey6UIpuQWdSS9pXctEV9R3uRSRbftxFRNzjxB3is9d7P2+2goKhkSgf40RL5mcArBrJzmtFaermo=
Received: by 10.115.54.1 with SMTP id g1mr2097020wak.1196962731065; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.192.9 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <30b660a20712060938q460982f6r68e8127bf836890e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:38:51 -0800
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 1 to 3.4
In-Reply-To: <20071206170252.GR10807@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20071206163755.GP10807@mercury.ccil.org> <20071206164435.GA29246@nic.fr> <20071206170252.GR10807@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3631a69ff9bb7a62
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0803985794=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

With that change, I think all of John's suggestions look good.

On Dec 6, 2007 9:02 AM, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:

> Stephane Bortzmeyer scripsit:
>
> > > 2) In 3.1.2, I'd prefer to say that implementations MUST rather than
> > > SHOULD ignore undefined fields in the registry.  There is no reason
> > > why implementations should not be required to be liberal in what
> > > they accept.
> >
> > I believe it would forbid a registry-checking application (like the
> > one IANA should run after any change). So, it seems a bad idea.
>
> Fair enough.  Concedo.
>
> --
> "Well, I'm back."  --Sam        John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>



-- 
Mark

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email