Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6
"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Fri, 13 March 2009 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3DC3A6C2C for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.246
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.660, BAYES_00=-2.599, FAKE_REPLY_C=2.012, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAiSmZxhJ6d6 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout10.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout10-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AD7C3A6ACB for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6112 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2009 00:56:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (67.166.27.148) by smtpout10.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.235) with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2009 00:56:56 -0000
Message-ID: <DB349D62BE7E4B6888E936F417DE80F5@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:56:54 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:56:19 -0000
Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote: >> however I hope ietf will continue to let users apply for their own >> variant subtags. > > That's what 4646bis does, so I don't see how there's any issue. John had proposed doing away with this as unnecessary in an 4646ter era that included ISO 639-6. -- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
- RE: [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-6 Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: ISO 639-6 Scott Hollenbeck
- Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6 Doug Ewell