[Ltru] Re: Modified: field in the registry?
"Doug Ewell" <dewell@roadrunner.com> Sun, 24 June 2007 23:54 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2bub-0000Hc-RE; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:33 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I2bua-0000HX-DN for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2bua-0000HP-40 for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:32 -0400
Received: from mta11.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.205]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2buY-0001bj-Rv for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:32 -0400
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([76.167.184.182]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070624235430.OORI8388.mta11.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81> for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:54:30 -0400
Message-ID: <008001c7b6bb$01e31f70$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <E1I1aji-0004VT-8h@megatron.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:54:30 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Modified: field in the registry?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic dot fr> wrote: > Isn't it a problem that there is no way to know the modification date? > Should we work on a Modified: field in the registry? We should first make sure we understand the purpose for adding this information. We have an Added date so that tag users can see which subtags were available at any given time. But because of certain stability measures we have taken, once a subtag is added, it should always be valid from that point on, with essentially the same meaning. A Modified date might imply that the meaning of a subtag changed on that date, which isn't supposed to happen. -- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Re: Modified: field in the registry? Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Modified: field in the registry? Addison Phillips