RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647
Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Wed, 05 December 2007 17:36 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzyAH-0007sh-VA; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:36:05 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzyAG-0007sK-E6 for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:36:04 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzyAG-0007s8-3z for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:36:04 -0500
Received: from mail2.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.215] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzyAF-0004FP-Ph for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 12:36:04 -0500
Received: from tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.70.186) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.222.3; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:36:03 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.70.186]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 09:36:03 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:35:56 -0800
Subject: RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647
Thread-Index: AQHINxvP/mHTtEJPbECW4Y5qIDvalYzeW/NQ
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E4CB3F05@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E55DFC2F2EE3@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E55DFC2F2EE3@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Addison expressed a concern at delaying 4646bis. It is an option to complete 4646bis and the re-charter to update 4647. (It also seems to me some changes to 4647 might be useful.) Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Steele [mailto:Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:49 AM > To: Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group > Subject: RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647 > > > Thus my claim that, by expecting people to stick with blind > > RFR, we are expecting them to ignore 4647. > > I agree completely. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647 Shawn Steele
- RE: [Ltru] RFR - RFC4647 Peter Constable