IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Defining a CBOR tag for RFC 5646 Language Tags

Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com> Thu, 15 May 2014 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFB51A01C2 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.981, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8_x8eauXDPS for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x232.google.com (mail-qc0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386C11A01F1 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l6so3115809qcy.9 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=53hIThFS/6Fk86z8TKTrT6KQQWvZhyTKaSGnRi5hqZw=; b=Lr4Y0sZDONQqEjOd9lHy31TmiFSL8Av2W5b2aub7V9OoXOhaabb2oThRxvJPjpmeW0 y/IMseGo9L1dv5Ce/FOttTDgG1odHbc/FajeVI4+DpDyJTaAQIIbMS4m8/Ri58xqGrZ+ 0YHUYEw/JRnsqqDGcfF2LODewAXJqClkgmG14hWZCzBIwwRC5lyXGAM/9J7ahfCWh4nm RmkdRHyF2ftlRGeNmYZX6E+B3u4qylNvezyQqhgObBHxF15V1f+ZoZW1Ls/pO+VRMYcp e0X3NncjRu2aiXOw0Rr2sJavZ6SecGIo2ygRDBxu/eiJaT5Vs3QvG58gcSYdvSbbOy2M shwA==
X-Received: by 10.224.161.83 with SMTP id q19mr18050746qax.56.1400197047604; Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.151.81 with HTTP; Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140515083955.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.b69c089194.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
References: <20140515083955.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.b69c089194.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
From: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:37:07 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Z3IPOU6ubfg3UKE8yyd6OpE__Lw
Message-ID: <CAJ2xs_H60RHSoUWYb4b_pioM9qG+RzNrMiGqZm_R6QVotabHjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0149ccdea35e9d04f978c7c2"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ltru/WowmfjeIF0JXsOL5Tv541d0hjDI
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] [apps-discuss] Fwd: Defining a CBOR tag for RFC 5646 Language Tags
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 23:37:36 -0000

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:

> But if this
> "tagged text" model is too far out of step with the CBOR/JSON way of
> thinking, Plane 14 is out there.
>

​I was perhaps not forceful enough. Deprecated Unicode characters should
*never* be generated by any modern software, and that includes the language
tags. They certainly should not be used in any new protocol.

Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis>

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email