Re: [Ltru] Re: New and modified subtags, after ISO 15924

There is such a requirement in 4646bis, which is now explicit (as of 
draft-07) that all registrations follow the same process. Changes to a 
request form really need to be seen publicly. More eyes on the form will 
prevent accidents.

Addison

Mark Davis wrote:
> I don't think there will ever be such a rush for any ISO codes that we 
> need to circumvent a short waiting period.
> 
> mark
> 
> On 7/18/07, *Doug Ewell* <dewell@roadrunner.com 
> <mailto:dewell@roadrunner.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Is there any requirement, in either draft-4646bis or in our
>     discussions,
>     that final records be posted to ietf-languages for a week-long review
>     when the only changes are due to changes in the ISO standards?
> 
>     If not, we can send the new ISO 15924-based changes immediately.
> 
>     -- 
>     Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
>     http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
>     http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
>     http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ltru mailing list
>     Ltru@ietf.org <mailto:Ltru@ietf.org>
>     https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru