[Ltru] Public RFC 3934 warning to jfc

Jefsey -

I am very disappointed that, after recent attempts at constructive
postings, you find it necessary to revert to such invective. You
are hereby warned, in accordance with RFC 3934, that your
posting privileges to the ltru working group mailing list may be
revoked, for a period of up to 30 days, if your disruptive behaviour
persists.

Randy, ltru co-chair

----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "r&d afrac" <rd@afrac.org>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 4:25 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] "666 Marked meta-spam" (was Route 66)
>

> At 06:25 15/10/2005, Doug Ewell wrote:
> >Misha Wolf <Misha dot Wolf at reuters dot com> wrote:
> >
> > > Will we ask for a number ending in 66?  If so, for which of the RFCs?
> >
> >I understand that the RFC Editor is solely responsible for issuing RFC
> >numbers, and can pick any number imaginable.  I don't suppose it would
> >hurt to ask, though, keeping the 1766 -> 3066 legacy in mind.
> 
> Dear all,
> I cannot object "Route 66" is not a perfect name concept for the 
> American Globalization document which, at perfect time, sides the 
> IESG with the USG's positions to the eyes of the world.
> 
> Genuine arrogance or total inconsciousness, such a thread does not 
> help pretending the IETF is multicultural/multinational. Why not to 
> add St John the Evangelist among the authors and to wait for the RFC 
> 4666 number? It would be perfect mnemonic for the world to think of 
> contents, protocols, Google searches leaking cultural/racial readers' 
> characteristics as "4666 Marked".
> jfc  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru