Re: [Lucid] Problem statement and scope
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 10 March 2015 02:28 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: lucid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lucid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C5A1A006F for <lucid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EyXsU7Ywq7Zg for <lucid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEA81A007A for <lucid@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B09868A031 for <lucid@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 02:28:22 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:28:21 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: lucid@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150310022821.GK10131@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <A81A9FC9-9B62-4783-8C21-1ED462821835@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A81A9FC9-9B62-4783-8C21-1ED462821835@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lucid/s4rAoPIhZcoAPEtcLKpuBZXBbQM>
Subject: Re: [Lucid] Problem statement and scope
X-BeenThere: lucid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Locale-free UniCode Identifiers \(LUCID\)" <lucid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lucid>, <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lucid/>
List-Post: <mailto:lucid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lucid>, <mailto:lucid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 02:28:43 -0000
Dear colleagues, On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:13:33AM -0500, Marc Blanchet wrote: > Hello, > First item to agree is the problem statement and scope. Do we have a concensus on this? Let me start some (on purpose wide) questions: > - is the problem only limited to a few codepoints where the pre-composed and composed forms are not normalized appropriately? > - are we tackling homoglyphs? > - else? In response to these questions (admittedly, somewhat longer after the fact than we'd have liked), Asmus and I have put together a draft outlining what we understand to be the issues. It's at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sullivan-lucid-prob-stmt/. We'd like very much to have some discussion on the list prior to Dallas. If we go into the meeting in Dallas without the necessary preparation, the BoF will not tell us what to do next. I also really strongly encourage people to read draft-klensin-idna-5892upd-unicode70 (which is currently at -03 but, I understand, may become an -04 in the very near future). There's a lot of very helpful background in it. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- [Lucid] Problem statement and scope Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Lucid] Problem statement and scope Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Lucid] Problem statement and scope John C Klensin