[Lwip] Fwd: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks

"Cao,Zhen" <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Mon, 27 May 2013 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4415921F9397 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2q7lKVzuo7z for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A101521F920B for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hq7so1232270wib.10 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UQxeCd2tyyYeLZw2kwWdvVmtawbfw4AqeoKDzOIxp0w=; b=FtYPuRQPM0fa2jSqofhCGww8V5Rc1rzlp4tVwd9ZYgnKPtB28AyduC2SqPiI1934hh Yqa4Y+07mWW6QdA9KcyY0bqid+rEkWIz0l770ggPg9yrVc9lr15WWPV49rFUWV28WYq9 EYgNYtnblkM/u+PVDCfpv7gDOqoY7SquXGW/oAYRY4XO4qbzw6pkbJTTgMKEhkfZ7iM5 OAOiSXfVpz/FtzhNAlTpFbwj+MK+wp1ClJsv5ztSUF5rZPXNF5ti4znIxAmtKmvDHvZg HWtdLZmxi+uqi1eSk4hgbHjxFM9OZAW40durBtZBNMajxcQJOjhi2Z8EQ8l5htiiN+sA SvKQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.205.178 with SMTP id lh18mr6957943wic.47.1369631628773; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.52.9 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8A686412-6903-451E-8B46-6763EA9F38D5@gmail.com>
References: <20130524181840.1900.71091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8A686412-6903-451E-8B46-6763EA9F38D5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:13:48 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHASd==NDSjTdJ9oK2=tvdBRCk_FQiecvMdTSFVR_V3nWxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Cao,Zhen" <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c37b60b4ccd504ddac36c8"
Subject: [Lwip] Fwd: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 05:13:54 -0000

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, May 26, 2013 at 1:13 AM
Subject: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for
discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node
networks
To: 6tsch@ietf.org


FYI...

Begin forwarded message:

> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org>
> Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a
WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks
> Date: May 24, 2013 2:18:40 PM EDT
> To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, cabo@tzi.org
>
>
> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
>
> List address: 6lo@ietf.org
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/
> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
> Purpose: Since it was set up in 2005, the 6LoWPAN WG has created
specifications
> for building IPv6 networks out of devices that use the IEEE 802.15.4
> wireless network standard. This work has culminated in the recent
> publication of RFC 6775, 6LoWPAN-ND, and the 6LoWPAN WG is shutting down.
>
> This does not mean the work in this space is done. Indeed, 6LoWPAN
> produced one more document that isn't even about 802.15.4:
> draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-12.txt, the equivalent of 6LoWPAN for the low
> energy mode of the Bluetooth 4.0 specification, is now in IESG
> processing, waiting for the assignment of a number from the Bluetooth
> SIG. A number of related drafts want to apply 6LoWPAN technology to
> other constrained node network layer 2 specifications:
>
> -- draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-00.txt
> -- draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01.txt
> -- draft-mariager-6lowpan-v6over-dect-ule-02.txt
>
> Also, some additional specifications are generally regarded as useful
> complements of the existing 6LoWPAN work:
>
> -- draft-schoenw-6lowpan-mib-03.txt
> -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-05.txt
> -- draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05.txt
> -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-03.txt
>
> Beyond that, some older proposals that the 6LoWPAN WG has not picked
> up are receiving new attention:
>
> -- draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-03.txt
> -- draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt
>
> Finally, there are some architectural issues raised by 6LoWPAN's use
> of adaptation layer fragmentation on top of a lossy radio:
>
> -- draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-02.txt
>
> As can be seen, these drafts have been addressed to a zoo of working
> groups, including the sunsetting 6LoWPAN WG, the 6MAN WG, INTAREA, and
> even ROLL, with the addressed WG often changing over the lifetime of a
> draft. It is probably more productive to focus most of this closely
> related work on a specific WG.
>
> One clear candidate is the 6man WG. However, that WG has a number of
> other duties in maintaining IPv6 that make it subscribing to its
> mailing list too onerous to the group of experts interested in
> constrained node networking. It is probably worth separating out the
> 6man-related work that focuses on constrained node networks. There
> are, however, architectural aspects that are indeed best left in 6man
> or even INTAREA. The 6Lo mailing list has been set up to organize the
> discussion of a charter for a potential working group that focuses on
> IP-over-foo standardization (adaptation layers) for constrained node
> networks, working closely with the INT area working groups and other
> IETF WGs focused on constrained node networks.
>
> For additional information, please contact the list administrators.

_______________________________________________
6tsch mailing list
6tsch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch