[Lwip] Fwd: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks
"Cao,Zhen" <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Mon, 27 May 2013 05:13 UTC
Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4415921F9397 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2q7lKVzuo7z for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A101521F920B for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hq7so1232270wib.10 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UQxeCd2tyyYeLZw2kwWdvVmtawbfw4AqeoKDzOIxp0w=; b=FtYPuRQPM0fa2jSqofhCGww8V5Rc1rzlp4tVwd9ZYgnKPtB28AyduC2SqPiI1934hh Yqa4Y+07mWW6QdA9KcyY0bqid+rEkWIz0l770ggPg9yrVc9lr15WWPV49rFUWV28WYq9 EYgNYtnblkM/u+PVDCfpv7gDOqoY7SquXGW/oAYRY4XO4qbzw6pkbJTTgMKEhkfZ7iM5 OAOiSXfVpz/FtzhNAlTpFbwj+MK+wp1ClJsv5ztSUF5rZPXNF5ti4znIxAmtKmvDHvZg HWtdLZmxi+uqi1eSk4hgbHjxFM9OZAW40durBtZBNMajxcQJOjhi2Z8EQ8l5htiiN+sA SvKQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.205.178 with SMTP id lh18mr6957943wic.47.1369631628773; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.52.9 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8A686412-6903-451E-8B46-6763EA9F38D5@gmail.com>
References: <20130524181840.1900.71091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8A686412-6903-451E-8B46-6763EA9F38D5@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:13:48 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHASd==NDSjTdJ9oK2=tvdBRCk_FQiecvMdTSFVR_V3nWxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Cao,Zhen" <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c37b60b4ccd504ddac36c8"
Subject: [Lwip] Fwd: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 05:13:54 -0000
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, May 26, 2013 at 1:13 AM Subject: [6tsch] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks To: 6tsch@ietf.org FYI... Begin forwarded message: > From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat@ietf.org> > Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks > Date: May 24, 2013 2:18:40 PM EDT > To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, cabo@tzi.org > > > A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. > > List address: 6lo@ietf.org > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/ > To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo > > Purpose: Since it was set up in 2005, the 6LoWPAN WG has created specifications > for building IPv6 networks out of devices that use the IEEE 802.15.4 > wireless network standard. This work has culminated in the recent > publication of RFC 6775, 6LoWPAN-ND, and the 6LoWPAN WG is shutting down. > > This does not mean the work in this space is done. Indeed, 6LoWPAN > produced one more document that isn't even about 802.15.4: > draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-12.txt, the equivalent of 6LoWPAN for the low > energy mode of the Bluetooth 4.0 specification, is now in IESG > processing, waiting for the assignment of a number from the Bluetooth > SIG. A number of related drafts want to apply 6LoWPAN technology to > other constrained node network layer 2 specifications: > > -- draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-00.txt > -- draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01.txt > -- draft-mariager-6lowpan-v6over-dect-ule-02.txt > > Also, some additional specifications are generally regarded as useful > complements of the existing 6LoWPAN work: > > -- draft-schoenw-6lowpan-mib-03.txt > -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-05.txt > -- draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05.txt > -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-03.txt > > Beyond that, some older proposals that the 6LoWPAN WG has not picked > up are receiving new attention: > > -- draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-03.txt > -- draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt > > Finally, there are some architectural issues raised by 6LoWPAN's use > of adaptation layer fragmentation on top of a lossy radio: > > -- draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-02.txt > > As can be seen, these drafts have been addressed to a zoo of working > groups, including the sunsetting 6LoWPAN WG, the 6MAN WG, INTAREA, and > even ROLL, with the addressed WG often changing over the lifetime of a > draft. It is probably more productive to focus most of this closely > related work on a specific WG. > > One clear candidate is the 6man WG. However, that WG has a number of > other duties in maintaining IPv6 that make it subscribing to its > mailing list too onerous to the group of experts interested in > constrained node networking. It is probably worth separating out the > 6man-related work that focuses on constrained node networks. There > are, however, architectural aspects that are indeed best left in 6man > or even INTAREA. The 6Lo mailing list has been set up to organize the > discussion of a charter for a potential working group that focuses on > IP-over-foo standardization (adaptation layers) for constrained node > networks, working closely with the INT area working groups and other > IETF WGs focused on constrained node networks. > > For additional information, please contact the list administrators. _______________________________________________ 6tsch mailing list 6tsch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch