Re: [Lwip] lwig-terminology-03

Charles Palmer <charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com> Sun, 31 March 2013 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522AE21F87B7 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.965
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.965 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSe0a7YpDRiv for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway16.websitewelcome.com (gateway16.websitewelcome.com [69.56.239.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B7521F87A4 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway16.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 687FFA912C13B; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:28:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator192.hostgator.com (gator192.hostgator.com [184.173.197.213]) by gateway16.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E32A912C116 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:28:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [81.135.82.151] (port=55992 helo=[192.168.1.80]) by gator192.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com>) id 1UMIJC-000641-Br; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:28:30 -0500
Message-ID: <515839FB.9040406@acutetechnology.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:28:27 +0100
From: Charles Palmer <charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <20130328163903.7794.26957.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F696C606-2278-49FF-9F7B-7BE75A1E73C6@tzi.org> <51581118.8020905@acutetechnology.com> <A8B7235A-48C2-4D12-8826-2F31E1EFACFB@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <A8B7235A-48C2-4D12-8826-2F31E1EFACFB@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator192.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acutetechnology.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([192.168.1.80]) [81.135.82.151]:55992
X-Source-Auth: charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: YWN1dGV0ZWM7YWN1dGV0ZWM7Z2F0b3IxOTIuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ==
Cc: lwip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lwip] lwig-terminology-03
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:28:32 -0000

Hi Carsten

The new text on regulatory constraints reads fine: it is enough to 
remind readers that there are legal as well as technical constraints. I 
had not intended to suggest that EN300 220-1 should be included in the 
text. I'll add more on this in a new thread.

Regards - Charles

On 31/03/2013 13:54, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2013, at 12:34, Charles Palmer <charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com> wrote:
>
>> I've read the new draft and offer some suggestions, mostly editorial, but there are a couple of other constraints that I think might merit mentioning (particularly regularory), and a couple of questions I have embedded in the text. The edited version is here:
> Thanks, those suggestions did allow me to improve the text.
> I've left out the specific reference to EN 300 220-1 (assuming that was what you meant), but did add a bit of reference to regulatory issues (since we aren't defining terminology for them, a little reminder of them is all that is needed).
> I already had changed all the lists that summarize the class numbers into tables; I was wondering whether examples in those tables help or give the impression the examples are the definition.  In the end I did add the examples to the Ex table.
>
> I'm not sure we want to give too many examples for how the various classes go together; this would be ratholing quickly, and I trust readers will have enough phantasy to do this on their own.
>
> So this makes the -03, just submitted:
>
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-03
> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-03
>
> In separate news, I've also added Ari Keränen as a co-author, who has supplied and edited some of the power text.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>


-- 
Regards - Charles Palmer
Project Hydra Project Manager - Acute Technology Limited
Woodthorpe, Calver Road, Baslow, Derbyshire, DE45 1RR, United Kingdom
Mob: +44 (0)7977 577 627    Skype: Acutetech
Email: charles.palmer@acutetechnology.com Web: http://projecthydra.info