[Lwip] FW: Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Fri, 15 February 2013 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D6A21F89B9 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:26:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0hXPj0zp9map for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:26:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E7821F8512 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r1FBQRDk014324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <lwip@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:26:27 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id r1FBQRSn030623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <lwip@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:26:27 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.216]) by DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:26:27 +0100
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"
Thread-Index: Ac4K1k19fsSHyM+zSJKg/BwqfIncewAmL+ow
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:26:26 +0000
Message-ID: <E4DE949E6CE3E34993A2FF8AE79131F8021A18@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.126]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1908
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1360927587-00003C02-5BA73B91/0-0/0-0
Subject: [Lwip] FW: Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:26:31 -0000

Wrong mail address, resending.

Mehmet

_____________________________________________
From: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 6:11 PM
To: 'coman@ietf.org'; 'core@ietf.org'; lwig-chairs@tools.ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: 'ext Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'; Juergen Schoenwaelder; ext Benoit Claise
Subject: Review of draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03 on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements"


Hi All,

based on the agreement in the OPS-DIR meeting in IETF 83 and the support of the O&M AD Benoit Claise we set up the Coman (COnstrained MANanagement) activity and the corresponding maillist on May 16, 2012.

Since then quite a number of people worked on the document on "Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement, Use Cases and Requirements" with their text contributions and comments. Many thanks to all who helped getting it to the current stage.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ersue-constrained-mgmt-03

With this email we would like to start a review of the draft above.
Please provide your comments to any of the maillists on the Too-list (please CC Coman maillist).
We hope on a useful discussion concerning the problem statement, use cases and requirements.

As the next step, we decided during IETF 85 to provide a new draft with a gap analysis on missing standards at the IETF for the purpose of Constrained Device&Network Management with the goal to highlight new work at IETF. This draft will be written just after getting the above document more stable based on your comments.

Thank you in advance.

Cheers,
Mehmet

Coman maillist info:
List address: coman@ietf.org<mailto:coman@ietf.org>
Archive:   http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coman/
To subscribe:  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coman