[Lwip] New version: draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis-05.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 02 September 2019 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7E3120044 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 11:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H048viNDQrAC for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE4A120025 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 11:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (p548DCCB9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46Mdh94Vq4zyxd; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 20:21:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 589141284.444194-852565377e3f48e22c4d607cb7f79cd4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 20:21:28 +0200
Message-Id: <5A7415CA-0473-44A2-BD60-AA0B8F792BA8@tzi.org>
To: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/aZo1bkuzFFN5z-MSuFCc8pY3Fvw>
Subject: [Lwip] New version: draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 18:21:33 -0000

I submitted a new version of the 7228bis document.
New is only section 4.4, which tries to discuss device characteristics in time keeping.
This hasn’t had the benefit of a review from my co-authors, but I wanted to have this out before I go on summer vacation (yes, we can have these after Labor Day :-).

Since time keeping is a topic that is often discussed when creating protocols for constrained devices, I’m sure there will be lots of comments!

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis-05
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis-05

Grüße, Carsten