Re: [Lwip] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)

Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Fri, 30 October 2020 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291FB3A0AA7; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS=1.927, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aUZkvqmsDJw2; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1937A3A0AA3; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.40.4]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 09U8BVLI032479; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:11:31 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.39.6]) by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FF51D53C1; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:11:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 83.38.106.121 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:11:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4184f7d3e5b3a9b4c87257d05f880c96.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <160335195068.27314.14109443790513694032@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <160335195068.27314.14109443790513694032@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:11:31 +0100
From: Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks@ietf.org, lwig-chairs@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org, Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at violet
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:11:31 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/kALl3nqsPBmfncKOWFqMgpeVoIE>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Lightweight IP stack. Official mailing list for IETF LWIG Working Group." <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:11:37 -0000

Hi Murray,

Thank you very much for your review!

We just submitted revision -12, which aims at addressing the comments
received from the IESG and related reviewers:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-12

Please find below our inline responses:


> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Piling on: You don't appear to need Section 2.

Agreed. We removed Section 2.

> Is Section 8 meant to be removed before publication, a la RFC 7942?

We would like to keep former Section 8 (now, Section 7), entitled "Annex.
TCP implementations for constrained devices".

Just for clarity, the next section ("Changes compared to previous
versions") is intended to be removed be removed before publication.

Thanks,

Carles (on behalf of all authors)