Re: [Lwip] Lwig Minutes at IETF86

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Tue, 19 March 2013 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B817A21F8BE7 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hthBUvVCEKYj for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f48.google.com (mail-qe0-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2D421F8C3E for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 9so339618qea.35 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=PFrpT7D30wZ8kIPWYUOffeC9a7RfzFlsFEUtChZi2wk=; b=J65FXiihMCXWf/MEnnVVu11xtiR7KEvYZdcG3juqgQO0j3nafH/3UBFOQkndlQKKZp jbPWnnNImnCCS1g8jiMrO9WN8jxUpRgD1aKdgM/bFMe4tRIpJOVLmq9YloSRIh8GFM+5 4RT78m1SyIJxis+6U901l6JPClBT5udBxC1PxwWFuDwr9H3iMUWTu+94fzLYteji1pwP 9Tb1uJ2sTyKxHxfhJGE9AyM5ks+Dgru2OHNHOcOkhIO9sdjnNBdemIWtVcWazVVj+OJg uZOKt1y17PdUpc0VAwOEYvJcZbt2wrItr5lm8YVUcMfPjV+g4gpDx+ee0mALwOpVsXC3 fRYA==
X-Received: by 10.49.25.12 with SMTP id y12mr323443qef.1.1363705562766; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.94.16 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <000601ce24a9$9aecb480$d0c61d80$@chinamobile.com>
References: <00c201ce246d$6ab42870$401c7950$@chinamobile.com> <CANK0pbbagVCwirHVjjdzefW0SbC58GQi4T+yeNgmk2sY=srOAg@mail.gmail.com> <000601ce24a9$9aecb480$d0c61d80$@chinamobile.com>
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:05:42 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: pYO5Y-M_xVKtC450L6HLppmXu1Y
Message-ID: <CANK0pbZc73nUYQiE+dHhf5onE6F4T9P2iGUfj9ztu9hpkf66QQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d902ba5df9504d8487102"
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Lwig Minutes at IETF86
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:06:05 -0000

Hi Zhen,
I agree that my comment may not be relevant for all existing documents, but
it may be valid for documents to come, and it may also be relevant for more
than one existing document. For
instance, draft-kovatsch-lwig-class1-coap-00 talks in section 2.4. about
the complexity of dealing with separate responses, which heavily depends on
the OS in use. Similarly, in section 2.2 of the same document, there is a
mention of issues coming from the OS using a single buffer, which is not
necessarily the case depending on the operating system in use?
Best,
Emmanuel


On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Cao Zhen (CZ) <caozhen@chinamobile.com>wrote:

> Hi Emmanuel,****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for check. I thought your comments were valid for this document,
> not necessarily applied to all documents, most of which did not talk about
> implementation skills. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> zhen ****
>
> *From:* lwip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Emmanuel Baccelli
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 19, 2013 6:14 PM
> *To:* lwip@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Lwip] Lwig Minutes at IETF86****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Zhen,****
>
> I added a remark I made during the meeting, that was not logged so far.
> During the slot about draft-hahm-lwig-painless-constrained-programming-00,
> I remember saying that in all documents, where appropriate, we should aim
> at distinguishing what issues come from hardware constraints, and what
> issues come from constraints imposed by the operating system in use.****
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Emmanuel****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Cao Zhen (CZ) <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi all,
>
> Minutes are available via http://tools.ietf.org/wg/lwig/minutes
>
> Thank Floris very much for taking the notes at the Etherpad.
>
> If you found something missing or not accurate, please stated and edit via
> the Etherpad.
>
> Thanks,
> zhen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip****
>
> ** **
>