Re: [Lwip] draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-01

"Cao Zhen \(CZ\)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com> Wed, 03 April 2013 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0491E21F8678 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_221=2.222]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pU+1MZBOPI3K for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta.chinamobile.com (cmccmta.chinamobile.com [221.176.64.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BA68221F8675 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.20.12]) by rmmx-oa_allagent01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee1515bb5e7e9b-afe9b; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:54:00 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee1515bb5e7e9b-afe9b
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[10.2.43.180]) by rmsmtp-oa_rmapp02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee2515bb5e3721-d1334; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:54:00 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee2515bb5e3721-d1334
From: "Cao Zhen (CZ)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
To: 'Tero Kivinen' <kivinen@iki.fi>, lwip@ietf.org
References: <20826.52725.576960.725759@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <20826.52725.576960.725759@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:54:21 +0800
Message-ID: <009d01ce3027$4f683410$ee389c30$@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFl7Wk2A5yUar/gbyz8QJUE8NOO7pmUb8/A
Content-Language: zh-cn
Subject: Re: [Lwip] draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-01
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:54:37 -0000

Hi Tero

> The draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal-01 will be expiring soon, and we
had discussion in the last
> September / October about making this WG document, and also in the last WG
meeting. What I
> have not yet received is the final end result of that discussion, i.e. are
we going to make this a WG
> document, which means I should most likely submit it as WG document, or
what we are going to do
> it.
> 
> One of the things I am planning to add to it is to replace the Appendix
B.2 with new text that says
> that the old Raw RSA keys are going to be obsoleted, and new method
defined in the
> draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey should be used. I most likely do not have
time to act on these
> drafts this week, but my plan is to reserve some time next week to work on
my IETF drafts, so
> getting reply back before that would be nice...

Thanks for the work. This clears the Oct/2012 discussion of RSA keys and I
would declare that the previous call for consensus is confirmed. 

Please finish the editorial changes and we would like to work on it as a
working group document. 

Thanks you for sharing your expertise. 
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://w